Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 29;6(1):e1000653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000653

Figure 4. Confidence levels obtained from fits to the data in Tab. 2.

Figure 4

The power Inline graphic of Eq. (54) was varied in steps of 0.1 for four different uncertainties of the observed threshold diameters Inline graphic. The assumed relative diameter error reflects mainly differential shrinkage. As confidence level the probability that Inline graphic is greater than the fitted Inline graphic is shown.