Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 7;21(2):291–296. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp301

Table 4.

Cox regression analysis for hospital, with and without adjustment for ER status and IMD for those with 1–3 nodes positive in patients aged <70 years

Factor Category Relative hazard and 95% CI
Univariate, unadjusted Multivariate, mutually adjusted
ER status Negative 1.00 (–) 1.00 (–)
Positive 0.30 (0.22–0.40) 0.31 (0.23–0.41)
Not known 0.77 (0.55–1.08) 0.73 (0.51–1.03)
IMD score Trend per 10% 1.10 (1.03–1.28) 1.10 (0.99–1.22)
Hospital 1 1.00 (–) 1.00 (–)
2 2.09 (1.15–3.78) 1.76 (0.97–3.20)
3 1.21 (0.72–2.02) 1.07 (0.63–1.80)
4 1.09 (0.69–1.73) 1.01 (0.63–1.61)
5 1.28 (0.71–2.29) 1.10 (0.60–2.00)
6 1.53 (0.91–2.56) 1.38 (0.82–2.31)
7 1.66 (1.02–2.71) 1.47 (0.89–2.40)
8 2.22 (1.27–3.88) 1.75 (0.96–3.18)
9 2.05 (1.20–3.49) 1.61 (0.94–2.77)
10 1.64 (0.96–2.79) 1.46 (0.84–2.52)
Significance of hospital differences P = 0.03 P = 0.8

ER, estrogen receptor; IMD, Index of Multiple Deprivation; CI, confidence interval.