Table 3.
Variable | DR | Control | DIO |
---|---|---|---|
Group size | 12 | 11 | 12 |
Body weight (grams) | |||
Initial | 297 ± 1 | 300 ± 1 | 302 ± 2 |
Final | 512 ± 3 | 510 ± 3 | 589 ± 4* |
Food Consumption (kcal/day) | |||
Weeks 0-2 | 98 ± 2 | 103 ± 2 | 116 ± 2* |
Weeks 2-6 | 97 ± 2 | 97 ± 1 | 114 ± 2* |
Fat Pads (grams)† | 27.8 ± 1.7 | 20.3 ± 1.2 | 36.8 ± 2.3 |
Plasma Glucose (μmol/ml) | 10.6 ± 0.6 | 10.9 ± 0.4 | 11.2 ± 0.8 |
Plasma Insulin (ng/ml) | 7.8 ± 1.9 | 7.4 ± 2.3 | 17.3 ± 3.7* |
Insulin/Glucose Ratio (ng/μmol) | 0.73 ± 0.17 | 0.65 ±018 | 1.63 ± 0.38* |
Plasma Leptin (ng/ml) | 4.0 ± 0.6 | 1.3 ± 0.2** | 5.1 ± 0.5 |
Data are means ± sem. DR, diet-resistant rats; Control, chow-fed rats; DIO, diet-induced obese rats. Fat pads weighed were: epididymal, mesenteric and retroperitoneal.
P < 0.05 differs significantly from either DR or control values
P < 0.05, any group comparison significantly different
P < 0.05, differs significantly from either DR or DIO values (ANOVA, Tukey test).