Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul-Sep;16(3):141–145. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.56228

Table 2.

RNFL thickness parameters (mm) (mean and SD) global and for each quadrant in (group A and B)

RNFL Quadrants PXS group (A) (Mean ± SD) Control group (B) (Mean ± SD) P value
Temporal 60.65 ± 7.85 72.45 ± 8.15 <0.05
Superior 112.9 ± 14.05 130.1 ± 9.33 <0.05
Nasal 67.35 ± 11.1 71.7 ± 8.16 >0.1
Inferior 105.2 ± 11.63 122.6 ± 11.81 <0.05
Global average 86.52 ± 19.7 99.21 ± 20.21 >0.05

In (group A), the values of RNFL thickness measurement in all quadrants were low compared to (group B). The average overall RNFL thickness was (86.52 plus/minus 9.7) in (group A) and (99.21 plus/minus 20.21) in (group B) with no quiet statistically significant difference between both groups (P greater than 0.05) [Figure 1]