Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 29.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Dev. 2009 Jan 1;24(4):4. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.10.001

Table 6.

Best Fitting Multivariate Predictors from Logistic Regression

Mathematical Learning Disability
Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) Odds Ratio (eb)
Intercept −6.59 1.54 −4.27 0.000 ---
Sex 1.31 0.94 1.39 0.163 3.71
IQ −0.81 0.53 −1.52 0.129 0.44
PL −0.84 0.52 −1.63 0.104 0.43
VSSP −1.01 0.58 −1.76 0.078 0.36
Number line 1.62 0.66 2.45 0.014 5.05
Count Error −0.51 0.32 −1.60 0.110 0.60
Low Achieving
Intercept 0.12 0.21 0.56 0.576 ---
Sex −0.73 0.33 −2.23 0.026 0.48
CE −0.54 0.22 −2.45 0.014 0.58
PL 0.31 0.20 1.59 0.126 1.36
d′ −0.45 0.24 −1.90 0.058 0.64
Number line 0.32 0.22 1.49 0.136 1.38
PCR −0.39 0.20 −2.01 0.045 0.68
Typically Achieving
Intercept −0.66 0.19 −3.41 0.000 ---
CE 0.30 0.19 1.60 0.110 1.35
d′ 1.00 0.29 3.47 0.001 2.72
Number line −0.54 0.23 −2.30 0.021 0.58
Count Error 0.62 0.27 2.29 0.022 1.86
High Achieving
Intercept −8.39 2.01 −4.17 0.000 ---
Sex 2.32 1.33 1.75 0.080 10.18
IQ 0.77 0.44 1.73 0.083 2.16
CE 1.13 0.72 1.56 0.119 3.10
VSSP 1.07 0.63 1.70 0.089 2.92
d′ 1.25 0.85 1.47 0.143 3.49
PCR 1.18 0.46 2.59 0.010 3.25