Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 10;43(6):484–490. doi: 10.1159/000264686

Table 2.

Univariate results, unadjusted amount of newly decayed primary and permanent tooth surfaces (n = 515 children with at least one follow-up exam)

Primary surfaces
Permanent surfaces
surface-years at risk
surfaces of new decay per person
p
surface-years at risk
surfaces of new decay per person
p
Treatment
 Standard 264 168 ± 60 7.4 ± 7.7 0.001 38 ± 30 0.4 ± 1.2 0.22
 Intensive 251 161 ± 57 9.8 ± 8.6 40 ± 27 0.6 ± 1.3
Enrollment cohort
 First year 132 160 ± 56 9.7 ± 8.5 0.06 44 ± 29 0.7 ± 1.6 0.12
 Second year 383 166 ± 59 8.2 ± 8.1 38 ± 28 0.4 ± 1.1
Head Start Center
 WSMC 434 167 ± 59 8.4 ± 8.3 0.14 39 ± 29 0.5 ± 1.2 0.05
 EPIC 81 155 ± 52 9.4 ± 8.1 38 ± 28 0.8 ± 1.5
Gender
 Female 249 164 ± 58 8.2 ± 8.0 0.46 42 ± 30 0.5 ± 1.3 0.67
 Male 266 165 ± 59 8.9 ± 8.5 36 ± 27 0.5 ± 1.2
Age quintile
 1st 104 175 ± 67 9.1 ± 9.8 0.91 25 ± 22 0.3 ± 0.9 0.70
 2nd 102 166 ± 60 8.7 ± 7.7 35 ± 28 0.5 ± 1.2
 3rd 103 167 ± 54 8.6 ± 8.3 38 ± 26 0.6 ± 1.6
 4th 103 162 ± 55 7.8 ± 7.4 44 ± 29 0.5 ± 1.1
 5th 103 154 ± 53 8.6 ± 8.0 55 ± 30 0.7 ± 1.4
Baseline dmfs1
 0 dmfs 222 192 ± 47 5.787.1 <0.001 37 ± 29 0.4 ± 0.9 0.04
 1–7 dmfs 152 170 ± 50 10.0 ± 8.4 38 ± 26 0.5 ± 1.2
 >7 dmfs 141 116 ± 52 11.6 ± 8.3 44 ± 31 0.8 ± 1.7
1

dmfs in primary surfaces only. All children had zero DMFS in permanent surfaces at baseline.