Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Psychol Rev. 2009 Feb 7;29(3):243. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.01.005

Table 6.

Occupational functioning measures

Measure Source Respa Facetsb Nitems NDepStudies Psychometrics
α rxx’
Employment NA Any E 1 >250 NA
Absenteeism NA Any A 1 >250 NA
SAS-SRc Weissman and Bothwell (1976) P P 6 23
WHO-DAS II Rehm et al. (1999) Any P 32d 17 .86
WAI Tuomi, Ilmarinen, Jahkola, Katajarinne, and Tulkki (1998) P A,P 2 4 .72
EWPS Endicott and Nee (1997) P P 25 3
SPS Lynch and Riedel (2001)e P P 32 2
SPS Turpin et al. (2004) P P 13 2 .82
WPI Burton et al. (1999) Many A,P 2 1
SPS Koopman et al. (2002) P P 3 1 .80
WLQ Lerner et al. (2001) P P 48 1 .89–.96
WPAI Reilly, Zbrozek, and Dukes (1993) P E,A,P 6 1 .71–.75
OFS Hannula et al. (2006) C E,A,P 1 1 NA .91

Measure abbreviations: SAS-SR: Social Adjustment Scale-Self-Report, WHO-DAS II: World Health Organization-Disability Assessment Scale, WAI: Work Ability Index, EWPS: Endicott Work Productivity Scale, SPS: Stanford Presenteeism Scale, WPI: Work Productivity Index, WLQ: Work Limitation Questionnaire, WPAI: Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire, OFS: Occupational Functioning Scale The psychometrics include measures of internal consistency (α) and test-retest reliability (rxx).

a

Respondent of the instrument: P (Patient), C (Clinician), Any (for anyone) and Many (for multiple respondents).

b

Facets include E (employment), A (absenteeism) and P (presenteeism).

c

The SAS-SR work subscale.

d

12 or 32 item versions for either clinician administered, self-report, or proxy respondents.

e

The original Stanford Presenteeism Scale was developed in 2001 but several shorter versions came afterwards and are listed below.