Skip to main content
. 1999 Jun 19;318(7199):1656–1660. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7199.1656

Table 2.

Net cost (£) per life year gained with the introduction of universal, voluntary antenatal screening for different prevalences of women who are unaware that they are HIV positive per 10 000 pregnancies

Model
Prevalence 1/10 000 1/10 000 15/10 000 15/10 000
Screening costs £40 £4 £40 £4
Scenario
Reference case* 114 400 7 300 3 300 Cost saving
Discount rate 3%  76 600 4 400 1 800 Cost saving
Discount rate 7% 151 600 10 400 5 200 Cost saving
Life years gained, not discounted  30 900 2 000   900 Cost saving
No life years gained for the mother 157 700 5 200 Cost saving Cost saving
Two life years gained for the mother  90 800 8 300 5 200 Cost saving
Low uptake of interventions§ 138 100 10 800 6 100 Cost saving
High uptake of interventions 103 800 5 700 2 100 Cost saving
Low lifetime cost of caring for child infected with HIV†† 116 600 9 400 5 500 Cost saving
High lifetime cost of caring for child infected with HIV‡‡ 112 200 5 100 1 100 Cost saving
*

Discounted at 5%. Uptake of interventions in the reference case is 75% for treatment with zidovudine, 40% for elective caesarean section, and 95% for formula feeding. Lifetime cost of care for child infected with HIV in the reference case is £178 300. Compared with 5% in the reference case. Compared with one year in the reference case. §Low uptake scenario corresponds to 60% for treatment with zidovudine, 20% for elective caesarean section, and 80% for formula feeding. High uptake scenario corresponds to 90% for treatment with zidovudine, 60% for elective caesarean section, and 100% for formula feeding. ††75% of costs of reference case. ‡‡125% of costs of reference case.