Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 1.

Published in final edited form as: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009 May 7;79(5 Pt 2):056104. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.056104

FIG. 2 — (a) AMD and (b) calculated between two random Poisson trains as a function of the total number of spikes in the trains. One spike train contained a constant number of 50 spikes while the spiking frequency in the other was varied between 2 and 200 spikes. While the AMD scales with the number of spikes in the trains, the remains constant as the number of spikes is varied.

Inline graphic — (a) AMD and (b) calculated between two random Poisson trains as a function of the total number of spikes in the trains. One spike train contained a constant number of 50 spikes while the spiking frequency in the other was varied between 2 and 200 spikes. While the AMD scales with the number of spikes in the trains, the remains constant as the number of spikes is varied.