Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Virol Methods. 2009 Oct 28;163(2):489. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.10.016

Table 1. Simulations to assess carryover contamination of HIV-1 at multiple steps of testing dried whole blood spots (DBS) by nested PCR for infant diagnosis.

Rates of false positive results when processing blank filter paper following DBS spiked with an average or a high concentration of HIV-1 DNA are shown by potential risk factors for contamination. The sampling procedure was to first punch a disc from a DBS containing HIV-1 followed by six punches of clean filter paper (blank discs 1-6) using the same instrument without any cleaning between punches.

Variations in Processing DBS # of series tested Sequence of Blank Disc punched following HIV-1(+) Disc
#1 #2 #6
DBS containing “high” (500 copies/punch) concentration of HIV-1 DNA
 Use of non-corroded hole punchers, and discs transferred on clean surface 40 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
DBS containing “very high” (5000 copies/punch) concentration of HIV-1 DNA
 Optimized protocolb 40 1c (2.5%) 0 (0%) 1c (2.5%)
 Discs punched onto shared surface 4 2 (50%) 1 (25%) 0 (0%)
 Use of corroded hole punchers 5 1 (20%) 0 (0%) 1c(20%)
 No “precautions”a when transferring 1st to 2nd round PCR product 33 1c (3%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
a

“Precautions” refers to centrifugation of tubes post PCR prior to opening, and using a tissue to open the tubes, especially important to minimize 1st round PCR product at top of tubes that can contaminate gloves or splash into adjacent tubes upon opening lids to transfer amplicon to 2nd round PCR

b

Optimized protocol refers to using sharp punch instrument, individual clean disposable surface to collect disc punched from DBS, and precautions described above

c

Repeat gels of second-round PCR revealed persistent false (+), however when the original first-round PCR product was re-amplified in new 2nd round PCR, these yielded negative results, suggesting the original false positive result was due to inadvertent transfer (cross contamination) of PCR product between tubes between 1st- and 2nd-round PCR