Table 3.
Difference between 2nd-Order and VSOTF-Based Refraction Change (D) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
PD (mm) | Decentration (μm) | M | J0 | J45 |
3.5 | 0 | 0.05 ± 0.11 | −0.05 ± 0.07 | −0.02 ± 0.06 |
200 | 0.03 ± 0.26 | −0.04 ± 0.09 | −0.01 ± 0.07 | |
500 | 0.01 ± 0.37 | −0.02 ± 0.08 | 0.03 ± 0.09 | |
1000 | 0.03 ± 0.39 | −0.02 ± 0.13 | 0.04 ± 0.10 | |
1500 | 0.13 ± 0.43 | −0.02 ± 0.11 | 0.02 ± 0.05 | |
6.0 | 0 | 0.68 ± 0.31 | −0.18 ± 0.14 | 0.03 ± 0.06 |
200 | 0.61 ± 0.45 | −0.16 ± 0.17 | 0.04 ± 0.08 | |
500 | 0.63 ± 0.28 | −0.10 ± 0.23 | 0.00 ± 0.09 | |
1000 | 0.58 ± 0.53 | −0.06 ± 0.13 | −0.01 ± 0.12 | |
1500 | 0.560.65 | −0.16 ± 0.37 | 0.01 ± 0.15 |
The data are averaged from the 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270° meridian and expressed as mean and SD of the difference between second-order and VSOTF-based dioptric power vectors M, J0, and J45. Differences were not statistically significant. VSOTF refraction, simulated endpoint of the subjective refraction based on the BCVSOTF; M, spherical equivalent; J0, 0°/90° astigmatic component; J45, 45°/135° astigmatic component.