Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 2.
Published in final edited form as: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Dec;48(12):5806. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0661

Table 3.

Effects of Interaction between LOAs and HOAs on Treatment Effects as a Function of Decentration

Difference between 2nd-Order and VSOTF-Based Refraction Change (D)
PD (mm) Decentration (μm) M J0 J45
3.5 0 0.05 ± 0.11 −0.05 ± 0.07 −0.02 ± 0.06
200 0.03 ± 0.26 −0.04 ± 0.09 −0.01 ± 0.07
500 0.01 ± 0.37 −0.02 ± 0.08 0.03 ± 0.09
1000 0.03 ± 0.39 −0.02 ± 0.13 0.04 ± 0.10
1500 0.13 ± 0.43 −0.02 ± 0.11 0.02 ± 0.05
6.0 0 0.68 ± 0.31 −0.18 ± 0.14 0.03 ± 0.06
200 0.61 ± 0.45 −0.16 ± 0.17 0.04 ± 0.08
500 0.63 ± 0.28 −0.10 ± 0.23 0.00 ± 0.09
1000 0.58 ± 0.53 −0.06 ± 0.13 −0.01 ± 0.12
1500 0.560.65 −0.16 ± 0.37 0.01 ± 0.15

The data are averaged from the 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270° meridian and expressed as mean and SD of the difference between second-order and VSOTF-based dioptric power vectors M, J0, and J45. Differences were not statistically significant. VSOTF refraction, simulated endpoint of the subjective refraction based on the BCVSOTF; M, spherical equivalent; J0, 0°/90° astigmatic component; J45, 45°/135° astigmatic component.