Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 14;28(3):431–436. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7232

Table 1.

Comparison of Tobacco Use Intentions at Study Baseline by Patient Characteristics (N = 119)

Characteristic All Participants(N = 119)
Baseline Intentions Group
P
Committed Never Smokers*(n = 52)
Susceptible to Smoking(n = 67)
No. % No. Row % No. Row %
Age at baseline, years
    10-13 54 45.4 25 46.3 29 53.7 .602
    14-18 65 54.6 27 41.5 38 58.5
Sex
    Male 61 51.3 26 42.6 35 57.4 .809
    Female 58 48.7 26 44.8 32 55.2
Race
    White 98 82.4 46 46.9 52 53.1 .124
    Black 21 17.6 6 28.6 15 71.4
SES
    Low 29 24.4 12 41.4 17 58.6 .063
    Middle 31 26.0 19 61.3 12 38.7
    High 59 49.6 21 35.6 38 64.4
Diagnosis
    Leukemia 73 61.3 31 42.5 42 57.5 .733
    Solid tumor 46 38.7 21 45.7 25 54.3
Intervention arm
    Standard 37 31.1 14 37.8 23 62.2 .820
    Intervention 43 36.1 18 41.9 25 58.1
    Pilot 39 32.8 20 51.3 19 48.7
Past tobacco use
    Established/experimenter 16 13.4 3 18.8 13 81.2 .031
    Never 103 86.6 49 47.6 54 52.4
Peer tobacco use§
    Tobacco user 32 40.0 11 34.4 21 65.6 .472
    Non-tobacco user 39 48.7 17 43.6 22 56.4
    Don't know 9 11.3 4 44.4 5 55.6
Parent tobacco use§
    Tobacco user 31 38.8 11 35.5 20 64.5 .483
    Non-tobacco user 45 56.2 20 44.4 25 55.6
    Don't know 4 5.0 1 25.0 3 75.0

Abbreviation: SES, socioeconomic status.

*

Those with smoking intentions scores equal to 6 at study baseline.

Those with smoking intentions scores above 6 at study baseline.

P values are from a test of the association between patient characteristic and intentions group. χ2 or exact χ2 tests were used. For testing, “Don't know” (peer and parent use) and “pilot” (intervention group) categories were ignored.

§

Data provided only on the non-pilot cohort of 80 nonsmokers.