Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 3;102(3):179–186. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp467

Table 1.

Frequency distributions of various risk factors and crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for new occurrence of urinary tract cancer from multivariable logistic regression models*

Model 1
Model 2
Risk factor Case subjects, N = 4594 Control subjects, N = 174 701 Crude OR (95% CI) P Adjusted OR (95% CI) P Adjusted OR (95% CI) P
Sex
    Female 1566 83 671 1.0 (Referent) 1.0 (Referent) 1.0 (Referent)
    Male 3028 91 030 1.8 (1.7 to 1.9) <.001 1.7 (1.6 to 1.8) <.001 1.7 (1.6 to 1.8) <.001
Age, y
    <40 199 115 789 1.0 (Referent) 1.0 (Referent) 1.0 (Referent)
    40–59 1194 42 260 16.4 (14.1 to 18.9) <.001 16.2 (14.0 to 18.9) <.001 16.1 (13.9 to 18.8) <.001
    60–74 1932 11 308 99.3 (85.8 to 115) <.001 96.3 (83.1 to 112) <.001 95.5 (82.4 to 111) <.001
    75–99 1269 5344 138 (119 to 161) <.001 135 (116 to 158) <.001 135 (116 to 157) <.001
Residence in township where black   foot disease was endemic
    No 4506 174 151 1.0 (Referent) 1.0 (Referent) 1.0 (Referent)
    Yes 88 550 6.2 (4.9 to 7.8) <.001 4.4 (3.4 to 5.8) <.001 4.4 (3.4 to 5.8) <.001
Chronic UTI
    No 4511 174 091 1.0 (Referent) 1.0 (Referent) 1.0 (Referent)
    Yes 83 610 5.3 (4.2 to 6.6) <.001 1.6 (1.3 to 2.1) <.001 1.6 (1.3 to 2.1) <.001
Mu-Tong, total amount prescribed, g
    0 3987 149 464 1.0 (Referent) 1.0 (Referent) NA
    1–60 489 22 354 0.8 (0.7 to 0.9) <.001 1.0 (0.9 to 1.2) .579
    61–100 50 14859 1.3 (0.95 to 1.7) .108 1.6 (1.3 to 2.1) .003
    101–200 46 10035 1.7 (1.3 to 2.3) <.001 2.0 (1.4 to 2.7) <.001
    > 200 22 3953 2.1 (1.4 to 3.2) <.001 2.1 (1.3 to 3.4) .004
    Each 30-g increase NA NA 1.1 (1.01 to 1.1) .016 1.1 (1.06 to 1.15) <.001
Fangchi, total amount prescribed, g
    0 3927 150 456 1.0 (Referent) 1.0 (Referent) NA
    1–60 623 23 456 1.0 (0.9 to 1.1) .689 0.9 (0.8 to 1.0) .121
    61–100 15 427 1.3 (0.8 to 2.2) .293 0.7 (0.4 to 1.2) .180
    > 100 29 362 3.1 (2.1 to 4.5) <.001 1.3 (0.9 to 2.0) .181
Xi-Xin, total amount prescribed, g
    0 3680 139 385 1.0 (Referent) 1.0 (Referent) NA
    1–100 839 33 072 1.0 (0.9 to 1.04) .303 1.1 (1.003 to 1.2) .044
    101–300 54 1917 1.1 (0.8 to 1.4) .641 0.7 (0.4 to 1.2) .246
    > 300 21 327 2.4 (1.6 to 3.8) <.001 1.3 (0.9 to 2.0) .412
Aristolochic acid, estimated   total consumption, mg
    0 3274 121 820 1.0 (Referent) NA 1.0 (Referent)
    1–150 1151 48 869 0.9 (0.8 to 0.9) <.001 1.0 (0.96 to 1.1) .348
    151–250 69 2032 1.3 (0.99 to 1.6) .59 1.4 (1.1 to 1.8) .012
    251–500 64 1403 1.7 (1.3 to 2.2) <.001 1.6 (1.2 to 2.1) <.001
    > 500 36 577 2.3 (1.7 to 3.3) <.001 2.0 (1.4 to 2.9) <.001
    Each 100-mg increase NA NA 1.1 (1.03 to 1.1) <.001 1.1 (1.06 to 1.13) <.001
*

NA = not applicable; UTI = urinary tract infection.

Estimation of OR based on continuous variable for every 30-g increment of Mu Tong or 100-mg increment of aristolochic acid.

Logistic regression models for different dosages of Chinese herbs (model 1) and different estimated dosages of aristolochic acid as risk factors (model 2) were adjusted for age, sex, residence in a township where black foot disease was endemic, and history of chronic UTI.