TABLE 1.
Tibia | Radius | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Min | Max | Median | Interquartile range | Mean | SD | Min | Max | Median | Interquartile range | Mean | SD | |
Cortical porosity (%) | 2.1 | 9.2 | 3.9 | 3.1–4.9 | 4.4 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 1.1–2.1 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
Number of pores | 2805 | 13272 | 7825 | 5909–9841 | 8027 | 2567 | 397 | 4110 | 1517 | 1058–1884 | 1615 | 783 |
Mean cortical pore area (mm2) | 0.039 | 0.119 | 0.053 | 0.048–0.066 | 0.059 | 0.016 | 0.032 | 0.08 | 0.046 | 0.042–0.052 | 0.046 | 0.008 |
Cortical porosity with marrow (%) | 1.6 | 27.0 | 8.5 | 5.3–13.5 | 10.0 | 6.3 | 4.9 | 41.8 | 17.0 | 12.9–24.8 | 19.1 | 8.9 |
Number of pores with marrow | 152 | 2145 | 631 | 412–1069 | 765 | 494 | 122 | 699 | 258 | 177–328 | 266 | 108 |
Mean cortical pore area with marrow (mm2) | 0.057 | 0.314 | 0.128 | 0.108–0.176 | 0.144 | 0.053 | 0.027 | 0.238 | 0.075 | 0.059–0.086 | 0.075 | 0.03 |
A Shapiro–Wilk W test for normality showed that only the number of cortical pores for the tibia had a normal distribution