TABLE 2.
A. Male wing discs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Genotype | % yw WP | % yw H | WP:H ratio | n |
yw;+;+ | 100 | 100 | 1.5 | 6 |
dm4;+;Tub-dmyc/+ | 62 | 77 | 1.2 | 9 |
dm4;VgM/+;Tub-Gal4/+ | 41 | 56 | 1.1 | 24 |
B. Adult male wings | ||||
Genotype |
% yw blade |
% yw hinge |
B:H ratio |
n |
yw:+;+ | 100 | 100 | 9.6 | 34 |
yw;VgM/+;+ | 97 | 95 | 9.7 | 37 |
yw;VgM/+Tub-Gal 4/+ | 94 | 94 | 9.5 | 30 |
dm4;+Tub-dmyc/+ | 72 | 69 | 9.9 | 28 |
dm4;VgM/+;Tub-Gal 4/+ |
45 |
55 |
7.8** |
8a |
Wing specific loss of Tub>dmyc results in disproportionately smaller wing blades. **P = 9.3 × 10−11 (vs. yw;VgM); P = 2.0 × 10−8 vs. yw); P = 6.7 × 10−13 (vs. dm4;Tub>dmyc>Gal 4/+.)
Similar trends were obtained in three independent experiments; n = 15 for dm4;VgM; Tub-Gal4/+.