Skip to main content
. 2009 May 30;468(3):670–678. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0884-9

Table 2.

Studies comparing different braces

Study Type of brace Comparison Number of patients Average initial curve Conclusion
Nachemson and Peterson, 1995 [32] TLSO Total 286 25°–35° Brace prevented progression of curve 
Observation 129
Brace 111
Allington and Bowen, 1996 [1] Wilmington Total 188 < 30° The difference in progression between full-time and part-time bracing was not significant 
Full-time 36
Part-time 32 30°–40°
Full-time 62
Part-time 17
Katz et al., 1997 [25] Total 319 Boston brace more effective than Charleston in preventing curve progression
Charleston 166 32.9°
Boston 153 33.9°
Howard et al., 1998 [18] Total 170 TLSO superior in preventing curve progression
TLSO 45
Charleston 95
Milwaukee 30
Karol, 2001 [22] Total   117 Boston, Charleston no difference
Insufficient numbers for Milwaukee comparison
Milwaukee 10
Charleston 53 33.1° 
Boston   54
Gepstein et al., 2002 [13] Total 122   Both braces are equally effective; no significant difference was found between them
Charleston 85 20°–39°
TLSO 37
Danielsson et al., 2007 [8] (SRS +) Total 106  — Bracing more effective than observation
Boston 41 31.9°
Observation 65 39.4°
Janicki et al., 2007 [19] (SRS +) Total 83  — Providence brace is superior in preventing progression
TLSO 48 33.6°
Providence 35 33.7°

TLSO = thoracic-lumbar-sacral orthosis; SRS = Scoliosis Research Society.