Skip to main content
editorial
. 2010 Feb;9(1):56–60. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00270.x

Table 1.

Table 1 Study methods and prevalence of personality disorder from recently published epidemiological studies

Author, year (ref.) Country Method Prevalence (%) Screening instrument
Huang et al, 2009 (6) Western Europe (WE), Colombia (C), Household surveys Multiple imputation used to WE: 2.4 33-item screening questions
Lebanon (L), predict personality disorder C: 7.9 from the International
Mexico (M), scores using a three part L: 6.2 Personality Disorder
Nigeria (N), simulation procedure. Rates of M: 6.1 Examination (IPDE)
People’s Republic of China (PRC), personality disorder calculated as means of multiple N: 2.7
South Africa (SA), imputation prevalence PRC: 4.1
United States (US) estimates (n=21,162) SA: 6.8
US: 7.6
Coid et al, 2006 (3) England, Wales, Scotland Survey of a stratified sample 4.4 Screening questionnaire of
of 15,000 households (n=628) SCID–II
Grant et al, 2004 (7) United States of America Random sample 14.8 Alcohol Use Disorder and
(National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Associated Disabilities
Related Conditions) Interview Schedule, DSM-IV
(n=43,093) Version