Table 1.
Table 1 Study methods and prevalence of personality disorder from recently published epidemiological studies
| Author, year (ref.) | Country | Method | Prevalence (%) | Screening instrument |
| Huang et al, 2009 (6) | Western Europe (WE), Colombia (C), | Household surveys Multiple imputation used to | WE: 2.4 | 33-item screening questions |
| Lebanon (L), | predict personality disorder | C: 7.9 | from the International | |
| Mexico (M), | scores using a three part | L: 6.2 | Personality Disorder | |
| Nigeria (N), | simulation procedure. Rates of | M: 6.1 | Examination (IPDE) | |
| People’s Republic of China (PRC), | personality disorder calculated as means of multiple | N: 2.7 | ||
| South Africa (SA), | imputation prevalence | PRC: 4.1 | ||
| United States (US) | estimates (n=21,162) | SA: 6.8 | ||
| US: 7.6 | ||||
| Coid et al, 2006 (3) | England, Wales, Scotland | Survey of a stratified sample | 4.4 | Screening questionnaire of |
| of 15,000 households (n=628) | SCID–II | |||
| Grant et al, 2004 (7) | United States of America | Random sample | 14.8 | Alcohol Use Disorder and |
| (National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and | Associated Disabilities | |||
| Related Conditions) | Interview Schedule, DSM-IV | |||
| (n=43,093) | Version |