Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 21;9:1–9. doi: 10.4137/cin.s2892

Table 1.

Estimated error rates of various classification methods.Comparison of error rates estimated by the 0.632+ bootstrap method. Error rates were estimated for the dualKS method (rescaled variant) and compared to previously published estimates for the other methods, reproduced in the table.

Data set Classes SVM KNN DLDA SC.l SC.s NN.vs RF DKS
Leukemia 2 1.4 2.9 2.0 2.5 6.2 5.6 5.1 2.2
Breast (2 cl.) 2 32.5 33.7 33.1 32.4 32.6 33.7 34.2 29.1
Breast (3 cl.) 3 38.0 44.9 37.0 39.6 40.1 42.4 35.1 35.7
NCI 60 8 25.6 31.7 28.6 25.6 24.6 23.7 25.2 21.9
Adenocar. 2 20.3 17.4 19.4 17.7 17.9 18.1 12.5 23.9
Brain 5 13.8 17.4 18.3 16.3 15.9 19.4 15.4 14.1
Colon 2 14.7 15.2 13.7 12.3 12.2 15.8 12.7 14.9
Lymphoma 3 1.0 0.8 2.1 2.8 3.3 4.0 0.9 3.4
Prostate 2 6.4 10.0 14.9 8.8 8.9 8.1 7.7 15.8
SRBCT 4 1.7 2.3 1.1 1.2 2.5 3.1 2.1 2.2