Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul;1(1):4–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-5174.2007.00002.x

Table 3.

Difference between etoricoxib and comparators in change in biomarker concentrations from randomization at month 3

Relative difference (Etoricoxib minus Comparator) [% (CI)] Upper bound of CI meets non-inferiority criterion? P-Value Superiority testing of etoricoxib vs. comparator§,
Comparator
Placebo
CRP −7.8 (−30.5, 22.4) Yes 0.52
LDL-C −4.0 (−10.6, 3.2) Yes 0.20
Homocysteine −3.9 (−11.6, 4.6) Yes 0.30
Fibrinogen −3.7 (−9.4, 2.3) Yes 0.16
Celecoxib
CRP 23.1 (−6.8, 62.7) Yes
LDL-C −1.4 (−7.4, 4.9) Yes
Homocysteine −0.4 (−8.9, 9.0) Yes
Fibrinogen 2.5 (−3.6, 9.0) Yes
Ibuprofen
CRP 14.0 (−10.1, 44.6) Yes
LDL-C −2.9 (−8.0, 2.6) Yes
Homocysteine −3.0 (−10.5, 5.2) Yes
Fibrinogen 1.0 (−3.9, 6.3) Yes

CI was 97.5% for etoricoxib vs. placebo and etoricoxib vs. celecoxib, and 95% for etoricoxib vs. ibuprofen.

Test whether upper bound of CI for relative difference is less than non-inferiority margin (i.e., <80% for CRP and <20% for LCL-C, homocysteine, and fibrinogen).

§

Applicable only for the etoricoxib-vs-placebo comparison and only if etoricoxib was shown to be non-inferior to placebo.

Longitudinal analysis with repeated measures in a per-protocol population. Mixed model included factors for treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, gender, current tobacco use, diabetes, hypertension, age category (> or ≤median), and Framingham risk score as fixed effects using an unstructured covariance matrix.