Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov 24;38(3):797–809. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp1072

Table 1.

ChIP assay on putative HREs in the promoter of five NER factors

Genes Sequence 5′→3′ Location Relative fold enrichmenta
Ker/NT-nIr Ker/NT-10 h
XPB ggCGTGag −3960/–3953 1.1 ± 0.3 2.9 ± 0.4
caCGTGgt −3104/–3097 1.5 ± 0.4 0.9 ± 0.5
ggCGTGat −1647/–1640 0.8 ± 0.6 1.1 ± 0.4
ggCGTGag −1431/–1424 1.2 ± 0.5 1.1 ± 0.3
ggCGTGag −379/–372 3.8 ± 0.6 4.5 ± 0.7
XPF ggCGTGag −2201/–2194 1.1 ± 0.3 1.3 ± 0.2
gaCGTGaa −380/–373 1.9 ± 0.5 1.5 ± 0.4
XPG ggCGTGag −3314/–3037 1.1 ± 0.6 2.2 ± 0.6
ggCGTGgt −1898/–1891 0.9 ± 0.5 1.2 ± 0.4
taCGTGct −832/–825 4.0 ± 0.3 4.5 ± 0.6
CSA cgCGTGcc −2590/–2583 1.1 ± 0.4 1.0 ± 0.5
ggCGTGgc −642/–635 0.8 ± 0.3 1.1 ± 0.4
caCGTGct −276/–269 3.0 ± 0.5 5.0 ± 0.7
CSB ggCGTGgt −1267/1260 0.9 ± 0.2 1.6 ± 0.3
taCGTGga −270/–263 1.2 ± 0.3 1.1 ± 0.4
caCGTGgt −104/–97 5.0 ± 0.6 4.0 ± 0.8

aTen hours after UVB-exposure, irradiated and non-irradiated keratinocytes were subjected to ChIP assay using an anti-HIF-1α antibody. The relative levels of corresponding precipitated HRE fragments following ChIP were quantified by qRT-PCR using primers that span the indicated HREs. The PCR amplification in shHIF-1α-transduced cells detected a minimal level of HREs which was normalized to one for each experiment. The results are expressed as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments.