TABLE 5.
Association between score and HDL increase (all subjects)
| Min-Max |
Unadjusted Data |
Adjusted Dataa |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score Name (Possible Points) | β-Coefficientmmol/l per point (% per point) | Variance Explained % | P | β-Coefficient | Variance Explained % | P | ||
| Score LDL + HDL | 4-15 | Absolute | 0.0250 | 4.80 | 0.005 | 0.027 | 5.76 | 0.003 |
| (0–18) | Percentage | 1.54 | 4.00 | 0.011 | 1.61 | 4.37 | 0.009 | |
| Score LDL | 2-8 | Absolute | 0.0170 | 1.25 | 0.155 | 0.020 | 1.90 | 0.085 |
| (0–10) | Percentage | 1.12 | 1.23 | 0.161 | 1.24 | 1.49 | 0.127 | |
| Score HDL | 0-7 | Absolute | 0.0310 | 3.53 | 0.014 | 0.032 | 3.61 | 0.014 |
| (0–8) | Percentage | 1.85 | 2.66 | 0.035 | 1.90 | 2.76 | 0.033 | |
a
For residuals adjusted for age and blood glucose at randomization and percentage of BMI change during the study period.Bold indicates significant P-value as described in the Method section.