Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Anal. 2008 Jul 5;13(2):193. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2008.06.014

Fig.5.

Fig.5

Comparison of the classification results using the three methods for synthesized images. The first column contains the original images with the designed contrast level. The 2nd, 3rd and 4th columns are the classification results using the FCM, MFCM, and MsFCM methods, respectively. The MsFCM method performs better than the other two methods for images with different contrast levels (10%-60%)