Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Anal. 2008 Jul 5;13(2):193. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2008.06.014

Fig.8.

Fig.8

Overlap ratios of the classification results for the three methods, i.e. FCM, MFCM, and MsFCM. The images were obtained from the McGill brain database with 9% noise and 20% inhomogeneity. Each bar represent 5 classifications from 5 images, Mean and standard deviation are plotted. The MsFCM achieved higher overlap ratios compared to the other two methods.