Abstract
Dextran-coated superparamagnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) have widespread biomedical applications. The superparamagnetic behavior, specifically regulated size, and smooth morphology are crucial requirements for essentially all of these applications. Presented herein is an innovative double-coating strategy that would allow for a size-controlled synthesis of MNPs. Small monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticles (MIONs) were first synthesized, which served as the source of superparamagnetic properties. These MIONs were then treated in an acetate buffer containing biocompatible dextran polymer. Under such an environment, the colloidal MIONs would be quickly agglomerated by the acetate ions, and the formed coalescent body of MION would then be stabilized simultaneously by coating with dextran. By regulating the MION or dextran concentration as well as the thermal incubation time, the sizes of these first formed nanoparticles (termed 1st-NPs) could be readily controlled. A second dextran coating step was further applied to smoothen the 1st-NPs in attaining a final product (termed 2nd-NPs). The 2nd-NPs exhibited robustly storage stability due to the additional coating shell. Results successfully confirmed the plausibility of this approach, as these MNPs displayed not only a smooth outline and a narrow size distribution, but also the essential superparamagnetic behavior and a significantly prolonged stability upon storage.
Keywords: superparamagnetic nanoparticle, size regulation, stable storage, double coating
Introduction
Iron oxide-based magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) have attracted great interest owing to their widespread applications in biomedicine including sensing1, cell labeling2, imaging3, targeted delivery of drugs4 and genes5, as well as localized therapeutic hyperthermia6. Several comprehensive reviews concerning the properties, syntheses and applications can be found in the literature7–9. Generally speaking, these MNPs comprise a magnetic core consisting of magnetite [Fe3O4] or maghemite [Fe2O3], which is surrounded by a coating of a biocompatible polymer such as dextran or starch. Whereas the monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticles (MIONs) serves as the superparamagnetic resource, the polymer coating prevents MNPs from aggregation due to the intrinsic magnetic attraction. In addition, the activatable functional groups (e.g. −NH2, −OH) on the polymer also allow for conjugation of bioactive compounds such as drugs or antibodies on the MNP surface for subsequent targeting and delivery purposes.
The diameter of the MION core and the overall hydrodynamic size of MNPs (i.e. MION plus the polymer shell) are both of critical significance with regard to in vivo applications. Whilst nanoparticles greater than 300nm in size are known to be sequestered in liver and spleen and removed by the mononuclear phagocyte system, particles less than 10nm in diameter become small enough for rapid clearance through extravasations and renal filtration10,11. Indeed, MNPs with size ranging between 100–200nm in diameter have been reported to possess a long-circulating plasma half-life for imaging and targeting12 via the so-called enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) phenomenon of the tumor13. On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that magnetic properties such as magnetic-induced targeting of nanoscale magnetic particles depend primarily on the magnetophoretic mobility; a parameter that is enhanced solely when increasing the size of the magnetic core14.
Thus far, strategies for MNP synthesis include: 1) in situ synthesis of MION in the presence of polymer15; 2) in situ synthesis of polymer in the presence of pre-made MION16; or 3) direct mixing of pre-synthesized MION with polymer together17. However, some of these strategies involve the use of a surfactant as emulsifying agent, which is often not biocompatible and also affects the efficiency for subsequent surface modification with bioactive agents. Most critically, most of these strategies normally yielded an ill-defined morphology and an irregular size distribution for the produced MNPs and lacked the control of size.
Presented herein is an innovative and facile double-coating approach that allows for preparing MNPs with smooth morphology and desirable size control, and yet comprising of a large core structure with high magnetophoretic mobility while retaining the essential superparamagnetic behavior for biomedical applications. As reported, the monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticles (i.e. MIONs; the primary constituent of the magnetic core) are stable without forming tightly associated aggregates in acidic medium18. Our previous experiments showed that this stability of MION can also be alternatively attained by coating MIONs with a biocompatible polymer such as dextran and that, on the other hand, the colloidal MION suspension tends to agglomerate in the presence of acetate ions. Therefore, the underlying hypothesis is that if MION is treated in an acetate buffer containing dextran, both the processes of forming a coalescent body of MION and stabilizing this large magnetic core by dextran can take place in situ and simultaneously. By manipulating the MION or dextran concentrations in the solution, and/or by altering the pH or thermal incubation time of the reaction, a tightly size-controlled structure of MION can be realized. To further smoothen the morphology, these first-coated nanoparticles (termed 1st-NPs) are coated for a second time with a dextran solution (nanoparticles thus prepared are termed as 2nd-NPs). A schematic illustration of this approach is demonstrated in Figure 1. Results successfully confirmed the plausibility of the approach, as the double-coated magnetic nanoparticles not only display a smooth morphology and size, but also exhibit the essential superparamagnetic behavior and a significantly enhanced stability during storage.
Figure 1.
Schematic illustration of the proposed double-coating strategy: [A] precipitation of MION by acetate buffer only; [B] nanoparticles obtained after treatment with acetate buffer containing dextran (1st-NPs), and after second coating with a dextran solution (2nd-NPs); [C] MIONs coated with dextran solution only.
Experimental
Materials
Dextran (from Leuconostoc mesenteroides, MW: 9,000–11,000), ferrous chloride tetrahydrate (FeCl2·4H2O), ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O), HCl and sodium hydroxide were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. Water was distilled and deionized (ddH2O).
Preparation of the superparamagnetic, monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticles (MION)
MION was synthesized according to a modified procedure of Kim et al19. Briefly, a solution containing 0.76 mol/L of ferric chloride and 0.4 mol/L of ferrous chloride (molar ratio of ferric to ferrous was approximately 2:1) was prepared at pH 1.7 under N2 protection. The iron solution was then added drop-wise into a 1.5M NaOH solution under vigorous mechanical stirring. The reaction mixture was gradually heated (1°C/min) to 78°C and held at this temperature for one hour under stirring and N2 protection. After separation of the supernatant by using a permanent magnet, the wet sol was treated with 0.01M HCl and then sonicated for 1 hour. The acidified colloidal suspension of MION was filtered through a 0.45µm and then a 0.22µm membrane, followed by condensing to a suspension containing ~34mg Fe/ml using a Millipore (USA) ultrafiltration unit.
Preparation of double-coated magnetic nanoparticles
To synthesize 1st-NPs, dextran was pre-dissolved into a pH4 acetate buffer solution. To 3ml of this solution, 1ml of the MION suspension prepared above (pH=4) was added all at once under vigorous agitation. The mixture was then incubated in a 78°C water bath. To regulate the size of the produced nanoparticles, various concentrations of dextran and MION as well as different incubation time were attempted. The resulting 1st-NPswere purified twice by using a permanent magnet separator.
To prepare the final MNP product (i.e. the 2nd-NPs) possessing a smooth morphology and particle size, 1ml of the above-synthesized 1st-NPs (15mg Fe/ml) were added into 3ml of a dextran aqueous solution (320mg/ml) under agitation. After incubating the solution at 78°C for 15min, the final product was separated using a magnetic separator.
Characterization
Morphology was examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a JEOL 3011 high-resolution electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) operated at an accelerated voltage of 300 kv. Samples were prepared by placing diluted particle suspensions on formvar film-coated copper grids (01813-F, Ted Pella, Inc, USA) and then dried at room temperature. Particle size was measured by a NICOMP 380 ZLS dynamic light scattering (DLS) instrument (PSS, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) using the 632 nm line of a HeNe laser as the incident light. The NICOMP software was employed to analyze the volume-averaged size. Polymer contents of both the 1st-NPs and 2nd-NPs were determined by a Q50 thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA; TA Instruments, USA) under N2 atmosphere at a temperature increase rate of 20°C /min from 30°C to 600°C. Superparamagnetic properties were assessed at 25°C by using a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) (Quantum Design Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Iron contents of the magnetic nanoparticles were measured via the inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) analysis using the Perkin-Elmer Optima 2000 DV device (Perkin-Elmer, Inc., Boston, MA, USA). Stability was examined by DLS in terms of the variation in particle size versus time, after suspending MNPs into 0.1M PBS solution at room temperature. FTIR was performed on lyophilized samples after they were compressed into ~1 mm thick discs with spectroscopic grade KBr.
Results
Figure 1B illustrated the two-step process of producing the MION-based, dextran-coated MNPs. As seen, bare MIONs were first synthesized as the building blocks of the magnetic core. The 1st-NPswere then generated by suspending the colloidal bare MIONs into an acetate buffer containing dextran, followed by heating the mixture at 78°C for a certain period of time. After obtaining the 1st-NPs, the ultimate 2nd-NPs were produced by further coating and heating the 1st-NPs in a freshly prepared suspending medium containing dextran only.
Results summarized in Table I indicated that particle sizes of the 1st-NPs could be regulated by altering several parameters during the 1st coating step, including dextran and MION concentration as well as the thermal incubation period. When pairing data in samples #2 & #4 or samples #3 & #5 together for comparison (see Table I), it was obvious that under the same MION concentration (i.e. either 25 or 15 mg Fe/ml) and incubation time (25 min), increasing dextran concentration resulted in a reduction of the size of the 1st-NPs. A modest reduction in dextran concentration from 380 to 320 mg/ml led to a relatively significant change in particle size (from 139.5nm & 79.7nm in sample #2 & #3 to 187.2nm & 96.4nm in sample #4 & #5, respectively). Conversely, when dextran concentration and incubation time were held constant with MION concentration being reduced by a scale of approximately 10mg Fe/ml, such as those seen in samples #1 through #3 and #4 to #5, a dramatic decrease in particle size was observed. Alternatively, by holding both dextran and MION concentration in the reaction mixture unchanged but elevating the incubation time (samples 3# and #6 through #8) also appeared to enhance particle growth of the 1st-NPs. Since the main purpose of the second dextran coating was to smoothen the surface morphology and stabilize the MNPs from aggregation by magnetic attraction, there was no major difference in particle size between the 1st-NPs and 2nd-NPs.
Table 1.
Summary of experimental conditions and size distributions following syntheses of the 1st-NP and 2nd-NP products. Both the concentrations of detran and MION were before mixing; the ratio of dextran over MION was fixed at 3/1 in volume.
| Dextran Concentration in the 1st coating (mg/ml) |
MION Concentration (mg (Fe)/ml) |
Incubation Time (min) |
Size of 1st-NP (nm) |
Size of 2nd-NP (nm) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 380 | 34 | 25 | 188.1±11.8 | 195.6±15.8 |
| 2 | 380 | 25 | 25 | 139.5±8.7 | 152.7±13.0 |
| 3 | 380 | 15 | 25 | 79.7±6.2 | 94.0±9.1 |
| 4 | 320 | 25 | 25 | 187.2±13.1 | 190.1±11.4 |
| 5 | 320 | 15 | 25 | 96.4±8.9 | 107.7±8.7 |
| 6 | 380 | 15 | 35 | 112.1±7.8 | 116.1±8.0 |
| 7 | 380 | 15 | 45 | 125.5±8.8 | 142.2±11.3 |
| 8 | 380 | 15 | 55 | 152.9±9.2 | 158.7±12.8 |
TEM images of the synthesized MNPs were presented in Figure 2. The bare MION product displayed a homogeneous dispersion with a size distribution of 9±1.9nm, as calculated from the TEM image (Figure 2A). As anticipated, acetate ions induced coagulation of the mono-dispersed, colloidal iron oxide particles, as clusters of MION sols were observed for the 1st-NPs (Figure 2B). Aside from its stabilization effect in preventing particles from precipitation, the adhesive dextran polymer appeared to also act as a cross-linking agent to connect the small MIONs to form the large clusters of magnetic core structures. Apparently, dextran was not present in sufficient amount during the first coating process to fix the morphological appearance of these particles, as both the shape and outline of these 1st-NPs were rather irregular. Indeed, dextran coating could only be observed vaguely, when the TEM image of the particle was carried out at a much higher magnification (see insert in Fig. 2B). Nonetheless, following an additional dextran coating on the 1st-NPs, the 2nd-NPs exhibited smooth outline with tightly controlled size (Fig. 2C). Unlike the first step of MNP preparation, the second coating event occurred primarily on the particle surface, as dextran polymer could be easily identified by TEM under a high magnification (see insert in Fig. 2C). Besides, there are some satellite-like small paritcles within the 2nd-MNP. These small particles, however, were supposed to largely removed during the washing process. The remaining amount of small particles, whether by volume or by weight, was low, compared with the whole MNP. There was slight probability of retaining some of the uncoated MIONs, although it is difficult to identify the coating shell in the TEM image, simply because the positively charged MIONs were exposed to a high concentration of the negative-chaged dextran solution. In other words, the outmost layer of the 2nd-NP was virtually all of dextran, without the presence of naked MION. The observed good stablity of the 2nd-NP, shown later, was actually attributed to the thick and complete dextran coating shell.
Figure 2.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of [A] MIONs; [B] 1st-NPs; and [C] 2nd-NPs (i.e. final). Both the images of B and C corresponded to 2# in table 1.
Measurements using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) of the polymer contents of these synthesized MNPs also gave consistent results. As shown by the data in Figure 3, the 1st-NPs yielded a 10.01% weight loss using bare MIONs as the standard (i.e. 100% weight remaining). Obviously, this weight loss was primarily attributed to the introduction of dextran to bare MIONs during synthesis of the 1st-NPs. As expected, the 2nd-NPs displayed a total weight loss of 17.30%, 7.29% more than that of the 1st-NPs, due to the incorporation of additional dextran polymer to the previously coated nanoparticles.
Figure 3.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves of MIONs (top), 1st-NPs (middle), and 2nd-NPs (bottom) obtained at a temperature increase rate of 20°C /min from 30°C to 600°C under nitrogen atmosphere. The 1st-NPs and 2nd-NPs corresponded to 2# in table 1.
Figure 4 demonstrated the stability of the synthesized MNPs. While there was an abrupt elevation of size in the 1st-NP suspension after 2 hours of incubation in PBS solution (pH 7.4) at room temperature, the 2nd-NP suspension remained virtually stable during the entire course of storage of 120 hours under the same experimental conditions.
Figure 4.
Stability of the 1st-NPs (A) and 2nd-NPs (B) corresponding to 2# in table 1, stored in PBS solution (0.1M, pH=7.4).
The magnetic properties of MIONs and 2nd-NPs were also examined by SQUID, and the results were shown in Figure 5. Both MION and the 2nd-NP exhibited a typical superparamagnetic behavior in which particles did not remain magnetized in the absence of an external magnetic field, as reflected by the overlap between the magnetization and demagnetization curves and absence of a hysteresis loop. In addition, the 2nd-NP preparation displayed a saturation magnetic moment of 89.1 emu/g(Fe) that was in close resemblance with that (93.2 emu/g(Fe)) of the native MION without dextran coating.
Figure 5.
Magnitization/De-magnitization curves of MION (top) and 2nd-NP (bottom) by SQUID at 25°C. The 2nd-NP was the sample of 2# in table 1. No hysteresis loop was observed in either curve, indicating the presence of superparamagnetic behavior for both MION and the double-coated product (i.e. 2nd-NPs). Both types of nanoparticles also displayed a similar leverage of saturation magnitization (Ms), as reflected by almost overlapped plateaus.
Discussion
Existing dextran-coated superparamagnetic nanoparticles were generally synthesized by co-precipitation of ferrous and ferric salts in a dextran solution in the presence of a strong base such as NaOH or NH4OH. Although this strategy of forming dextran-coated nanoparticles was completed in single step, it nevertheless lacked the capability and flexibility to regulate the size and morphology of the final product. To overcome such shortcomings, a facile and robust approach that included a sequence of three individual and independent procedures was developed. The first step was to synthesize small diameter monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticles (MIONs) possessing the superparamagnetic behavior that was essential for the majority of biomedical applications. As being recognized, MION remained stable without forming aggregates in the HCl solution (pH 4). This was because MION carried abundant superficial hydroxyl groups that were protonated (Fe-OH2+) in acidic medium to produce positive surface charges, thereby preventing them from coagulation. Increasing pH, MION will lose its positive superficial charge and eventually aggregate and precipitate. Coincidently, the isoelectric point (PI) of MION was experimentally determined to be around 6.4 and its zeta potential in a pH4 HCl solution was approximately +25.4mV20–22. The purpose of this independent synthesis of MION was that it would allow for an open choice of conditions for subsequent polymer coating and size control.
The second step, termed 1st coating because it involved coating MION with dextran in the existence of acetate ions, was primarily for size regulation. As reported, the colloidal MION was easily surface-modified by certain carboxylate-containing compounds (R-COO−) including dimercaptosuccinate, citrate and tartarate23,24. However, the MION suspension precipitated when meeting with acetate. This phenomenon, in major part, was due to the reaction between superficial hydroxyl groups on MION (Fe-OH) and carboxylate ions to form Fe-O-C(O)-R linkages, a similar procedure as in literature 23, 24, which was herein testified by FTIR, as shown in Figure 6. A new absorbance peak at 1404cm−1, which corresponded to the symmetric vibration of the C-O bond, was identified when comparing the FTIR spectra with that of MION alone. The new formatoin of the linkage dramatically subtracted the stability effect steming from the suferficial hydroxyl groups. In addition, hydration of acetate ions and hence their ability to separate water molecules from the lyophilic MION according to the Hofmeister rule25 was another cause of the precipitating power of acetate ions on MION. On the other hand, iron-oxide based magnetic nanoparticles were often stabilized by coating with a dextran polymer via hydrogen bonds formed between the hydroxyl groups on both MION and dextran. Owing to the small size and high surface area-to-volume of MION, this coating is normally strong and independent on pH. Based on such existing knowledge, we hypothesized that if MION is treated in an acetate buffer containing dextran, then both of the processes of MION aggregation and dextran coating can take place in situ and simultaneously. This concomitant occurrence of acetate-induced coagulation and dextran-induced separation of the coalescent MION would offer the unique benefit of regulating the particle size of the produced MNPs, as formation of the final product relies on the competition of two reaction kinetics; i.e. MION aggregation and dextran coating. For instance, if the aggregation rate is slow as opposed to the rate of coating, such as under the situation of the presence of a high concentration of dextran in the acetate buffer, then only small dextran-coated particles would be produced. A signified example of this case would be when MIONs were coated in a dextran solution containing no acetate ions, whereas in theory and practice only monocrystalline structures of iron oxide particles would be formed (see Fig. 1C). Conversely, if aggregation takes place quickly when the coating rate is slow, such as by increasing the MION or acetate concentrations or reducing the dextran concentration in the coating medium, then formation of large MNPs would be expected. Similar to the extreme case displayed in Fig. 1A, MION would precipitate quickly as a large mass in acetate buffer containing no dextran. Furthermore, enhanced heating of the reaction mixture would augment the kinetic energy of the nanoparticles, thereby accelerating their collision rates and facilitating MION aggregation. Results presented in Table I have successfully confirmed our hypotheses, and by manipulating experimental parameters such MION or dextran concentrations in the reaction mixture as well as the thermal incubation time periods, MNPs with controllable sizes can be readily produced.
Figure 6.
FTIR spectrum of MION (A) and the acetate-treated MION (B). The acetate treated MION displayed an extra peak at 1404cm−1, which attributed to the symmetric vibration of C-O from the Fe-O-C(O)-R linkage between MION and acetate ions.
Although this simultaneous aggregation/coating tactic was capable of regulating the size of the produced nanoparticles, TEM image in Fig. 2B still indicated that the 1st-NPswere nevertheless irregular in morphology. Experimentally the 1st-NPs demonstrated poor stability in PBS buffer. It should be noted that the 1st-NP preparation in many ways, such as the irregular configurations, closely resembled to most of the commercial products (e.g. fliudMAG-CMX; Chemicell Inc., German), except that the size distribution of our MNPs was more narrower than those of existing commercial products; a tribute to this newly developed coating strategy. To prevail over these hurdles, a 2nd coating process which paved an extra layer of dextran on the surface of 1st-NPs was adopted. As shown in Fig. 2C, this additional dextran rendered the surfaces of the final MNPs notably smooth. More importantly, surface dextran provides a shielding effect on the surface energy of these colloidal nanoparticles, thereby preventing them from aggregation during storage. As demonstrated from results in Fig. 4, the stability of the 1st-NPs was boosted approximately 50-fold by this 2nd dextran coating, from a period of 2 hours to greater than 100 hours. Furthermore, the thick shell of dextran on the surface allows nanoparticles to be loosely associated via weak van der Waals forces, therefore remaining in a fluffy conglomerate state after sedimentation and suitable for re-dispersion, without encountering the so-called “caking” event (i.e. by forming a compact cake of tightly bound aggregates) even after long-term storage in an aqueous medium (data not shown).
For in vivo applications of magnetic nanoparticles, such as magnetic targeting and MRI, superparamagnetic behavior is of paramount importance. As from its definition, individual particles with superparamagnetic property do not maintain intrinsic magnetization in the absence of an external magnetic field, and therefore they will not agglomerate in solution prior to administration because of lack of magnetic attraction between particles. However, MION will only exhibit superparamagentic behavior below certain size threshold, namely the size of a single magnetic domain. The domain size for MION has been determined to be below 15nm26–29. In contrast, the efficiency of magnetic-mediated interaction such as targeting depends primarily on the magnetophoretic mobility; a parameter that can be enhanced only by increasing the size of the magnetic core. To this regard, the described technology of coalescing and coating MION simultaneously offers another significant benefit. While the exceedingly thin layer of dextran between MION crystals would provide a shielding effect to maintain the individual crystals under their original size of a single magnetic domain (size of bare MION was 9±1.9nm) thereby retaining the superparamagnetic behavior, the co-existence of acetate ions rendered MIONs to flocculate or, in other words, to form loosely associated fluffy conglomerates with large magnetic cores thereby retaining necessary magnetophoretic mobility for biomedical applications. Results in Fig. 5 confirmed the former event (i.e. superparamagnetism) whereas TEM findings in Fig. 2C revealed the latter phenomenon (i.e. large core of MION).
Overall, the described double-coating strategy in preparing MNPs offers a number of advantages over currently existing methods. First, it allows for the synthesis of MNPs with tailored size and smoothened configuration. As discussed previously, the size and morphology are of paramount significance with regard to clinical applications of these MNPs. To dodge the removal by RES and clearance by the kidney and liver systems thereby yielding a long blood circulating lifetime, it is essential to control the size of nanoparticles to be around 100–200nm. In addition, these physical attributes also dictate the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of MNPs under in vivo situations. Secondly, MNPs synthesized via this new method not only retain the superparamagentic behavior of MION that is essential for virtually all clinical applications, but also maintain a large core structure of MION that is highly responsive to attraction by the external magnetic field employed during MRI and tumor targeting. Thirdly, the markedly prolonged stability upon storage greatly facilitates the suitability of these MNPs for biomedical applications. Last but not least, the simplicity and flexibility of this new methodology permit MION to be coated with virtually all types of biocompatible polymers containing different functional groups, thereby enabling surfaces of these MNPs to be further modified with various recognition moieties (e.g. antibodies) or bioactive ligands (e.g. the RGD peptide) for targeting. To this regard, the value of this new coating strategy is prevalent and widespread.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported in part by NIH Grants CA114612 and RNS066945 as well as the Hartwell Foundation Biomedical Research Award. Dr. Faquan Yu is a recipient of the Hubei Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (2005ABB031), Hubei, China. Dr. Victor C. Yang is currently a Chang Kang Scholar by the Chinese Ministry of Education at the School of Chemical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China 300072.
References
- 1.Osaka T, Matsunaga T, Nakanishi T, Arakaki A, Niwa D, Iida H. Synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles and their application to bioassays. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2006;384:593–600. doi: 10.1007/s00216-005-0255-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wilhelm C, Billotey C, Roger J, Pons JN, Bacri J-C, Gazeau F. Intracellular uptake of anionic superparamagnetic nanoparticles as a function of their surface coating. Biomaterials. 2003;24:1001–1011. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00440-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Thorek DL, Chen AK, Czupryna J, Tsourkas A. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle probes for molecular imaging. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006;34:23–38. doi: 10.1007/s10439-005-9002-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cheng J, Teply BA, Jeong SY, Yim CH, Ho D, Sherifi I, Jon S, Farokhzad OC, Khademhosseini A, Langer RS. Magnetically responsive polymeric microparticles for oral delivery of protein drugs. Pharm Res. 2006;23:557–564. doi: 10.1007/s11095-005-9444-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dobson J. Gene therapy progress and prospects: magnetic nanoparticle-based gene delivery. Gene Ther. 2006;13:283–287. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Matteucci ML, Anyarambhatla G, Rosner G, Azuma C, Fisher PE, Dewhirst MW, Needham D, Thrall DE. Hyperthermia increases accumulation of technetium-99m-labeled liposomes in feline sarcomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:3748–3755. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mornet S, Vasseur S, Grasset F, Duguet E. Magnetic nanoparticle design for medical diagnosis and therapy. J Mater Chem. 2004;14:2161–2175. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Neuberger T, Schopf B, Hofmann H, Hofmann M, von Rechenberg B. Superparamagnetic nanoparticles for biomedical applications: possibilities and limitations of a new drug delivery system. J Magn Magn Mater. 2005;293:483–496. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gubin SP, Koksharov YA, Khomutov GB, Yurkov GY. Magnetic nanoparticles: preparation, structure and properties. Russ Chem Rev. 2005;74:489–520. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sachdeva MS. Drug targeting systems for cancer therapy. Expert Opin Inv Drug. 1998;7:1849–1864. doi: 10.1517/13543784.7.11.1849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gaur U, Sahoo SK, De TK, Ghosh PC, Maitra A, Ghosh PK. Biodistribution of fluoresceinated dextran using novel nanoparticles evading reticuloendothelial system. Int J Pharm. 2000;202:1–10. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5173(99)00447-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Enochs WS, Harsh G, Hochberg F, Weissleder R. Improved delineation of human brain tumors on MR images using a long-circulating, superparamagnetic iron oxide agent. J Mag Reson Imaging. 1999;9:228–232. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2586(199902)9:2<228::aid-jmri12>3.0.co;2-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Maeda H, Wu J, Sawa T, Matsumura Y, Hori K. Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review. J Controlled Release. 2000;65:271–284. doi: 10.1016/s0168-3659(99)00248-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pekas N, Granger M, Tondra M, Popple A, Porter MD. Magnetic particle diverter in an integrated microfluidic format. J Magn Magn Mater. 2005;293:584–588. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Molday RS. 452 773. US Pat. 1984;4
- 16.Ramirez LP, Landfester K. Magnetic polystyrene nanoparticles with a high magnetite content obtained by miniemulsion processes. Macromol Chem Phys. 2003;204:22–31. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Landfester K, Ramirez LP. Encapsulated magnetite particles for biomedical application. J Phys-Condens Mat. 2003;15:S1345–S1361. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Campos AFC, Tourinho FA, da Silva GJ, Lara MCFL, Depeyrot J. Nanoparticles superficial density of charge in electric double-layered magnetic fluid: A conductimetric and potentiometric approach. the European Physical Journal E. 2001;6:29–35. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kim DK, Zhang Y, Voit W, Rao KV, Muhammed M. Synthesis and characterization of surfactant-coated superparamagnetic monodispersed iron oxide nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater. 2001;225:30–36. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fauconnier N, Bee A, Roger J, Pons JN. Synthesis of aqueous magnetic liquids by surface complexation of maghemite nanoparticles. J Mol Liq. 1999;83:233–242. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sousa MH, Rubim JC, Sobrinho PG, Tourinho FA. Biocompatible magnetic fluid precursors based on aspartic and glutamic acid modified maghemite nanostructures. J Magn Magn Mater. 2001;225:67–72. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hingston FJ, Atkinson RJ, Posner AM, Quirk JP. Specific adsorption of anions. Nature. 1967;215:1459–1461. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fauconnier N, Pons JN, Roger J, Bee A. Thiolation of maghemite nanoparticles by dimercaptosuccinic acid. J Colloid Interf Sci. 1997;194:427–433. doi: 10.1006/jcis.1997.5125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fauconnier N, Bee A, Massart R, Dardoize F. Direct determination of organic acids in a ferrofluid (γ-Fe2O3) by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Liq Chromatogr R T. 1996;19:783–797. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Martin A. Colloids. In: Martin A, editor. Physical Pharmacy. 4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger; 1993. pp. 393–422. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jeong U, Teng X, Wang Y, Yang H, Xia Y. Superparamagnetic colloids: controlled synthesis and niche applications. Adv Mater. 2007;19:33–60. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tartaj P, Morales M, Veintemillas-Verdaguer S, Gonzalez-Carreno T, Serna CJ. The preparation of magnetic nanoparticles for applications in biomedicine. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2003;36:R182–R197. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Frenkel J, Doefman J. Spontaneous and induced magnetisation in ferromagnetic bodies. Nature. 1930;126:274–275. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gupta AK, Gupta M. Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials. 2005;26:3995–4021. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






