Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 9.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Relat. 2009 Oct 1;62(10):1459. doi: 10.1177/0018726709336500

Table 1.

Correlations, means, standard deviations and average variance explaineda

Variable Mean SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1. Work–family balance 3.61 .826 .83
2. Work-to-family enrichment 3.30 .926 .569** .80
3. Family-to-work enrichment 3.65 .852 .472** .572** .79
4. Work-to-family conflict 2.91 .905 −.271** −.182** −.004 .71
5. Family-to-work conflict 2.41 .883 −.198** .006 −.054 .658** .73
6. Job satisfaction 3.62 1.042 .615** .643** .348** −.265** −.115**
7. Organizational commitment 3.42 .813 .488** .558** .278** −.334** −.185** .700**
8. Turnover intentions 2.69 1.324 −.221** −.293** .011 .432** .319** −.540** −.589**
9. Family satisfaction 3.95 .963 .515** .345** .528** −.065 −.135** .350** .275** −.103**
10. Family performance 3.87 .727 .489** .261** .319** −.277** −.364** .296** .282** −.179** .486**
11. Family functioning 3.80 .779 .403** .216** .390** −.282** −.456** .264** .267** −.223** .621** .522**

Note: Values on the diagonal are the square root of the average variance explained which must be larger than all zero-order correlations in the row and column in which they appear to demonstrate discriminant validity (Fornell & Larcker, 1981).

a

N = 685.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.