Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 8;49(3):2457. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.062

Table 1.

Evaluation results for four template-based segmentation approaches.

Side and Template Dice Mean ± SD Dice Min/Max Surface Dist Mean ± SD Mean Max Surface Dist
Diseased SyGN Template 0.740 ± 0.07 0.6/0.85 0.78 ± 0.27 3.73
Diseased OA Template 0.728 ± 0.08 0.59/0.84 0.81 ± 0.28 3.66
Diseased Individual Template 0.690 ± 0.10 0.51/0.81 1.43 ± 1.2 5.1
Diseased Shape Template 0.686 ± 0.12 0.54/0.83 1.32 ± 1.1 4.9
Healthy SyGN Template 0.800 ± 0.09 0.52/0.88 1.01 ± 1.6 4.00
Healthy OA Template 0.802 ± 0.09 0.53/0.89 0.98 ± 1.6 3.48
Healthy Individual Template 0.781 ± 0.12 0.42/0.88 1.55 ± 2.1 5.47
Healthy Shape Template 0.776 ± 0.13 0.48/0.88 1.42 ± 1.7 5.01
Dice Measure Comparison T-value P-value Distance Measure Comparison T-value P-value
Diseased SyGN vs OA 2.60 0.021* Diseased SyGN vs OA 1.70 0.11
Diseased SyGN vs Indi 3.52 0.004* Diseased SyGN vs Indi 2.86 0.012*
Diseased OA vs Indi 2.41 0.037* Diseased OA vs Indi 1.69 0.12
Diseased SyGN vs Shape 3.55 0.004* Diseased SyGN vs Shape 2.80 0.014*
Diseased OA vs Shape 2.44 0.037* Diseased OA vs Shape 1.62 0.13
Healthy SyGN vs OA 0.34 0.738 Healthy SyGN vs OA −1.27 0.22
Healthy SyGN vs Indi 2.11 0.055 Healthy SyGN vs Indi 1.72 0.11
Healthy OA vs Indi 1.70 0.112 Healthy OA vs Indi 1.73 0.11
Healthy SyGN vs Shape 2.13 0.055 Healthy SyGN vs Shape 1.72 0.11
Healthy OA vs Shape 1.71 0.112 Healthy OA vs Shape 1.73 0.11
*

The * denotes significance.