Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 19.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Cell. 2010 Jan 19;17(1):98. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.020

Table 2.

Copy number alterations correlate with GBM subtype

ROI Proneural
(n=54)
Neural
(n=24)
Classical
(n=37)
Mesenchymal
(n=55)
Total #
Samples
Altered
Known Cancer
Gene in Region
A. Low and High Level Amplified Events
7p11.2 29 (54%)* 23 (96%) 37 (100%) 52 (95%) 141 EGFR
7q21.2 25 (46%)* 23 (96%) 34 (92%) 49 (89%) 131 CDK6
7q31.2 29 (54%)* 22 (92%) 32 (86%) 50 (91%) 131 MET
7q34 28 (52%)* 22 (92%) 32 (86%) 50 (91%) 132 -

B. High Level Amplification Events
7p11.2 9 (17%)* 16 (67%) 35 (95%)* 16 (29%) 76 EGFR
4q12 19 (35%)* 3 (13%) 2 (5%) 5 (9%) 29 PDGFRA

C. Homozygous and Hemizygous Deletion Events
17q11.2 3 (6%) 4 (17%) 2 (5%) 21 (38%)* 28 NF1
10q23 37 (69%) 23 (96%) 37 (100%) 48 (87%) 145 PTEN
9p21.3 30 (56%) 17 (71%) 35 (95%) 37 (67%) 119 CDKN2A/CDKN2B
13q14 28 (52%) 11 (46%) 6 (16%) 29 (53%) 74 RB1

D. Homozygous Deletion Events
9p21.3 22 (40%) 13 (54%) 34 (92%)* 29 (53%) 98 CDKN2A/CDKN2B

Abbreviations: ROI, region of interest;

The peak of the amplification is adjacent to PDGFRA; Significance of the difference in number of events between subtypes and remainder of the subtypes was tested using a two sided Fisher’s exact test, corrected for multiple testing using a Family Wise Error Rate. Bolded entries indicate p-values significant at 0.1 level. An asterisk indicates p-values significant at 0.01 level. Also see Figure S4 and Table S1.