Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 10.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Sep;89(9):1693. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.02.022

Table 3.

Estimates of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for each measure based on whether the dominant or the non-dominant upper extremity is affected. Values are expressed as raw scores, percentages of the total scale (where appropriate), and effect sizes.

MCID if dominant side affected MCID if non-dominant side affected
Raw value Percent of scale Effect size Raw value Percent of scale Effect size
Impairment measures
Grip strength (kg) 5.0 -- 0.48 6.2 -- 0.59
Composite strength (ratio of unaffected side) Unknowna -- -- 0.22 22% b 0.79
Activity measures
ARAT 12 21% 0.78 17 30% 1.1
WMFT Time (s) −19 16%c 0.48 Unknowna -- --
WMFT Function 1.0 17% 0.91 1.2 20% 1.0
Participation measures
MAL How well 1.0 17% 2.0 1.1 18% 2.2
Duration of use (hours) Unknowna -- -- Unknowna -- --
a

We were unable to estimate MCID values when there was no apparent relationship between the perceived change rating and the mean change on a given measure. See figures 2B, 3B, and 4B.

b

To calculate percentage, total scale was assumed to range from 0.0 to 1.0.

c

To calculate percentage, total scale was assumed to range from 0 to 120 seconds.