Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 10.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Mar;7(3):232. doi: 10.1038/nrn1871

Figure 5. Group-pacemaker hypothesis of respiratory rhythm generation.

Figure 5

The membrane potential of a rhythm-generating neuron is shown (VM, top trace) with network activity, represented by XII motor output (XII, bottom). Images to the right of the traces depict neuronal activity at different stages of the cycle. 1 is the refractory state that follows inspiration, in which activity-dependent outward currents depress membrane potential, and excitatory synapses in the network are inactive. During epoch 2, the most excitable neurons recover from post-burst hyperpolarization and begin to spike at a low rate. By 3 these highly excitable cells begin to synaptically activate other neurons, leading to aggregation of network activity itself due to recurrent synaptic excitation — a positive-feedback process. The inspiratory burst (4) ensues once a critical number of cells in the network are activated by recurrent excitation. In this final step, synaptic inputs recruit burst-generating intrinsic currents such as Ca2+-activated nonspecific cationic current (ICAN) and persistent Na+ current (INaP), which give rise to large inspiratory burst potentials with high-frequency spike activity. Inspiratory bursts terminate owing to intrinsic properties of cells that can reverse the positive feedback process, including Ca2+-dependent K+ currents and electrogenic pumps, which are recruited by cationic influx during inspiration.