. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Psychol. 2009 May;118(2):256. doi: 10.1037/a0015619

Table 3.

Results of planned statistical comparisons parsing between-group differences in the ERPs evoked by congruous and incongruous video endings in the 600-1000 ms time-window

Analysis	F-value

	Controls: C Contrast	Incongruous: G Contrast
Midline:

Frontal		8.503^**
Central	6.646^*	15.312^**
Parietal	11.543^**	16.019^**
Occipital	14.971^**
Lateral:

Parietal	18.827^**	11.091^**

Note: Controls: C Contrast – Effect of Congruence within the healthy control group, obtained in planned comparisons by Group; degrees of freedom 1,15;

Incongruous: G Contrast – Effect of Group for the incongruous video condition, obtain in planned comparisons by Congruence; degrees of freedom 1,30;

^**

p < .01;

p < .05