Table 5.
Analysis | Contrast | df | F-value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Midline: | Omnibus – interactions involving Comprehensibility and Congruence | Cm × C | 1,30 | 6.249* | ||
Planned comparisons by Comprehensibility | ||||||
More comprehensible | C × R | 4,120 | 9.670** | |||
Planned comparisons by Region | ||||||
Anterior-frontal | C | 1,30 | 15.859** | |||
Frontal | C | 1,30 | 6.508* | |||
Less comprehensible | C × G | 1,30 | 10.550** | |||
Planned comparisons by Group | ||||||
Controls | C | 1,15 | 17.076** | |||
C × R | 4,60 | 10.509** | ||||
Planned comparisons by Region | ||||||
Frontal | C | 1,15 | 9.241** | |||
Central | C | 1,15 | 15.175** | |||
Parietal | C | 1,15 | 29.221** | |||
Occipital | C | 1,15 | 31.529** | |||
Planned comparisons by Congruence Level | ||||||
Incongruous | G | 1.30 | 13.475** | |||
G × R | 4,120 | 6.537** | ||||
Planned comparisons by Region | ||||||
Frontal | G | 1,30 | 10.446** | |||
Central | G | 1,30 | 18.508** | |||
Parietal | G | 1,30 | 20.598** | |||
Occipital | G | 1,30 | 6.951* | |||
Lateral: | Omnibus: Interactions involving Comprehensibility and Congruence | Cm × C | 1,30 | 4.687* | ||
Planned comparisons by Comprehensibility Level | ||||||
More comprehensible | C × R | 1,30 | 12.984** | |||
Less comprehensible | C × G | 1,30 | 8.302** | |||
Planned comparisons by Group | ||||||
Controls | C | 1,15 | 15.534** | |||
C × R | 1,15 | 22.967** | ||||
Planned comparisons by Region | ||||||
Parietal | C | 1,15 | 29.114** | |||
Planned comparisons by Congruence Level | ||||||
Incongruous | G | 1,30 | 9.131** | |||
G × R | 1,30 | 5.549* | ||||
Planned comparisons by Region | ||||||
Parietal | C | 1,30 | 13.988** |
Note: df – degrees of freedom; Cm × C – Comprehensibility by Congruence interaction; C × R – Congruence by Region interaction; C – effect of Congruence; G × R – Group by Region interaction; G – effect of Group; C × G – Congruence by Group interaction.
p < .01;
p < .05