Table 6.

Estimates of effect size in statistical analyses contrasting influences of video congruence and comprehensibility on the ERPs between patient and control groups

Analysis	Contrast	Partial Eta Squared by Time-Window of Interest
		225-325ms	325-525ms	600-1000ms
Primary Omnibus ANOVAs examining congruence effects
Midline:	C	.153	.254	.012
	C × R	.111	.158	.341
	C × G	.033	.080	.200
	C × R × G	.002	.008	.099
Lateral	C	.199	.222	.054
	C × R	.187	.245	.477
	C × G	.031	.079	.203
	C × R × G	.002	.015	.143
Secondary Omnibus ANOVAs examining comprehensibility effects
Midline:	Cm × C	.005	.093	.172
	Cm × C × R	.024	.013	.039
	Cm × C × G	.063	.159	.104
	Cm × C × R × G	.171	.152	.038
Lateral	Cm × C	.000	.045	.135
	Cm × C × R	.012	.006	.001
	Cm × C × G	.036	.127	.053
	Cm × C × R × G	.163	.158	.004

Note: C – Main effect of Congruence;

C × R – Congruence by Region interaction;

C × E – Congruence by Electrode interaction;

C × G – Congruence by Group interaction;

C × H – Congruence by Hemisphere interaction;

C × R × G – Congruence by Region by Group interaction;

Cm × C – Comprehensibility by Congruence interaction;

Cm × C × R – Comprehensibility by Congruence by Region interaction;

Cm × C × G – Comprehensibility by Congruence by Group interaction;

Cm × C × R × G – Comprehensibility by Congruence by Region by Group interaction.