Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 2.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2010 Jan 18;121(4):519. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.883777

Table 1.

Comparison of control and hypertensive mice.

control DOCA p value
(n=10) (n=9)
Systolic 98 ± 5 114 ± 2 0.01
HR (beats/min) 564 ± 15 609 ± 14 0.03
Diastolic (n=4) (n=6)
E’ (cm/s) 5.6 ± 0.2 2.9 ± 0.2 <0.001
E’/A’ 1.5 ± 0.1 0.7 ± 0.1 <0.001
Vp (cm/s) 50.8 ± 1.9 29.8 ± 1.4 <0.001
E/E’ 16.1 ± 0.8 29.0 ± 1.5 <0.001
E/A 1.4 ± 0.4 1.5 ± 0.1 NS
Systolic
(n=6) (n=5)
%FS (%) 29 ± 1.9 33 ± 2.0 NS
%EF (%) 56 ± 2.9 60 ± 0.2 NS
Sm (cm/s) 3.3 ± 0.4 2.9 ± 0.1 NS
LV dimensions
(n=6) (n=5)
LVPWd (mm) 0.74 ± 0.01 0.76 ± 0.01 NS
LVEDd (mm) 3.8 ± 0.1 3.7 ± 0.2 NS
Myocyte
(n=9) (n=9)
Diameter (µm) 16.9 ± 0.5 16.8 ± 0.3 NS
(n=6) (n=6)
Length (µm) 123.2 ± 6.1 111.3 ± 12.9 NS

BP, blood pressure; HR, heart rate; E’, early septal mitral annulus velocity measured by tissue Doppler imaging (TDI); A’, late diastolic septal mitral annulus velocity (TDI);Sm, systolic septal mitral annulus velocity (TDI); Vp, left ventricular inflow propagation velocity by color M-mode Doppler; E, early diastolic filling velocity measured by conventional Doppler; A, late diastolic filling velocity measured by conventional Doppler; %FS, percent fractional shortening; %LVEF, percent ejection fraction; LV, left ventricle; LVPWd, LV posterior wall thickness; LVEDd, LV end diastolic dimension.