Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 May 1;73(6):771–779. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21930

TABLE IV.

Comparison of Changes in Left Ventricular Systolic Function and Volumes Between TOSCA-2 DES Patients Treated With DES and Those Treated With BMS

DES
BMS
Baseline
1 Year
Baseline
1 Year
Between groups change P value
Variable N = 30 N = 25 P value N = 148 N = 132 P value
Left ventricular ejection fraction (n = 22, 113) 44.8 ± 9.8 49.0 ± 9.6 0.06 49.1 ± 10.0 53.3 ± 10.2 <0.001 0.96
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction 4.2 ± 9.9 4.3 ± 8.9
Left ventricular systolic volume index (n = 15, 66) 47.7 ± 33.2 45.7 ± 45.8 0.71 33.1 ± 17.0 30.7 ± 17.5 0.17 0.94
Change in left ventricular systolic volume index –2.1 ± 21.1 –2.4 ± 14.1
Left ventricular diastolic volume index (n = 15, 66) 83.6 ± 55.1 84.6 ± 58.1 0.79 66.7 ± 28.6 66.2 ± 26.7 0.88
Change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index 1.0 ± 13.5 –0.46 ± 24.6 0.83
Regional wall motion score (n = 22, 112) –3.35 ± 1.00 –2.82 ± 0.87 0.01 –2.93 ± 0.86 –2.20 ± 1.10 <0.001
Change in regional wall motion score 0.53 ± 0.90 0.74 ± 1.04 0.38