Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 10.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Sci. 2010 Jan 1;13(1):120. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00864.x

Table 3.

Breakdown of Performance by Response Types for the 100% Condition

Response Type
Trial Age "No "Location "Out (door Proportion
Type Group change" change" Icon)" correct
2 objects in tested shape
Location Grades 1–2 0.15 0.72 0.13 0.61
change Grades 6–7 0.06 0.91 0.03 0.88
College 0.05 0.91 0.03 0.91
New Grades 1–2 0.07 0.07 0.85 0.85
color Grades 6–7 0.03 0.02 0.95 0.95
College 0.06 0.03 0.91 0.91
No Grades 1–2 0.73 0.12 0.14 0.73
change Grades 6–7 0.94 0.02 0.04 0.94
College 0.95 0.02 0.03 0.95
Other Grades 1–2 0.10 0.13 0.77 0.77
shape's Grades 6–7 0.03 0.05 0.92 0.92
color College 0.04 0.08 0.88 0.88
3 objects in tested shape
Location Grades 1–2 0.13 0.49 0.39 0.36
change Grades 6–7 0.06 0.80 0.14 0.73
College 0.07 0.83 0.09 0.79
New Grades 1–2 0.09 0.14 0.77 0.77
color Grades 6–7 0.04 0.11 0.85 0.85
College 0.04 0.06 0.90 0.90
No Grades 1–2 0.54 0.16 0.30 0.54
change Grades 6–7 0.78 0.06 0.16 0.78
College 0.84 0.05 0.10 0.84
Other Grades 1–2 0.17 0.18 0.65 0.65
shape's Grades 6–7 0.07 0.08 0.85 0.85
color College 0.07 0.09 0.84 0.84

Note. For location changes, responses were counted as correct in this table only if the correct location was indicated. The distribution of responses was similar for other attention conditions, though overall levels varied.