Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biochem J. 2010 Feb 9;426(2):197–203. doi: 10.1042/BJ20091612

Table 1.

Thermodynamic parameters for thermal denaturation of yeast frataxin variants. Effect of functional mutations on the protein thermal stability and iron binding affinity.

Protein ΔH (kJ.mol−1) ΔGa (J.mol−1) Tm (°C) ΔTm (°C) Δ(ΔG)b (J.mol−1) Kd (μM)c
Wild Type 118.0 ± 1.3 5946.7 40.4 ± 0.1 - - 10.4 ± 2.1
N122K 145.6 ± 2.1 7772.2 44.7 ± 0.1 + 4.3 ± 0.2 2286.6 11.0 ± 3.8
N122A 125.9 ± 1.7 4106.2 35.9 ± 0.1 − 4.5 ± 0.2 −2461.5 14.0 ± 1.0
K123T 120.1 ± 1.7 6197.8 41.0 ± 0.1 + 0.6 ± 0.2 323.0 18.8 ± 2.4
Q124A 143.5 ± 1.3 5366.0 39.0 ± 0.1 − 1.4 ± 0.2 758.1 13.2 ± 3.8
N122A/K123T/Q124A 90.8 ± 1.3 5863.5 40.2 ± 0.1 − 0.2 ± 0.2 107.9 27.1 ± 1.0
101/103A 230.5 ± 3.3 11001.4 52.0 ± 0.1 + 11.6 ± 0.2 6030.4 20.9 ± 0.6
86/90/93A 214.6 ± 3.8 11546.2 53.2 ± 0.1 + 12.8 ± 0.2 6630.0 21.3 ± 1.0
86/90/93/101/103 A 322.6 ± 6.3 16687.9 64.2 ± 0.1 + 23.8 ± 0.2 11925.2 22.8 ± 0.9
a

ΔG at 25°C, considering an estimate for ΔCp of 50.2 J/mol/K.

b

Δ(ΔG) =[Δ(Tm)] × ΔSm = [Δ(Tm)] × (ΔHm/Tm), where ΔSm and ΔHm are values for the wild type.

c

(n=2)