Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2009 Dec 21;50(1):277. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.039

Table 2. Effect of the memory task difficulty and attention conditions on the ERP amplitude.

Results of the two-way ANOVA on ERP mean amplitude, with memory difficulty (no, low and high) and attention condition as factors, for the three tested timewindows. Statistical values (F, ε and P) of attention and memory difficulty main effects and of attention by memory interaction effect are indicated with the control condition included (attention condition factor with 3 levels: attended, control and ignored) and with the control condition excluded (attention condition factor with 2 levels: attended and ignored). Significant effects are highlighted in grey.

150-200ms 200-250ms 250-300ms
F ε P F ε P F ε P
Control condition included attention 13.2 0.996 <0.001 38.6 0.893 <0.001 40.2 0.934 <0.001
memory difficulty 0.1 0.987 0.865 0.9 0.978 0.387 1.9 1.000 0.165
attention x memory 1.7 0.984 0.171 2.7 0.855 0.048 1.4 0.933 0.246

Control condition excluded attention 22.6 1.000 <0.001 49.1 1.000 <0.001 66.8 1.000 <0.001
memory difficulty 0.5 0.963 0.609 1.7 0.984 0.203 1.5 0.953 0.247
attention x memory 2.9 0.963 0.072 3.2 0.984 0.050 2.2 0.953 0.128