Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr Psychol. 2007 Jul 3;33(1):50. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsm053

Table I.

Descriptive Statistics for PAT2.0 for Female and Male Caregivers

Female caregivers N =132
Male caregivers N =73
PAT2.0 scale (Items) Scale range Internal consistency M SD Range M SD Range
Total 0–7 .81 1.11 .81 0–3.87 .85 .53 0–2.58
Structure/resources (1, education, 5, 7, 8) 0–8 .62 1.15 1.37 0–6 .89 1.02 0–4
Family problems (13a–j) 0–10 .72 1.42 1.68 0–8 1.16 1.44 0–6
Social support (4 a–d) 0–4 .69 .12 .48 0–4 .04 .20 0–1
Stress reaction (14a–c) 0–3 .64 .61 .91 0–3 .37 .79 0–3
Family beliefs (15a, c, f, h) 0–4 .59 1.33 1.24 0–4 1.18 1.09 0–4
Child problems (11a–n, p) 0–15 .81 2.74 3.01 0–13 2.70 2.88 0–13
Sibling problems (12a–n, p) 0–15 .73 1.27 2.10 0–12 1.89* 2.48 0–7

Note: Mean comparisons between mothers and fathers on PAT2.0 Total and subscale scores (N =64).

*

Significant difference between mothers and fathers (p < .05). Internal consistency calculated using Kuder–Richardson-20 and conducted on data provided by the primary caregiver (whether identified as mother or father).