Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Feb;19(2):537. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0898

Table 4.

Association between SULT1A1 genotypes and mammographic breast density of study population by number of pregnancies: Group Health, Seattle, WA 2004 – 2005

Number of live births SULT1A1 genotype n* (%) Mean§ (95%CI) Absolute % diff p-value p trend
0 R213/R213 26 (16.7) 49.3 (40.3, 58.4) Reference -- 0.05
R213/H213 16 (10.2) 41.3 (32.8, 49.9) −8.0 0.21
H213/H213 8 (5.1) 30.4 (12.5, 48.3) −18.9 0.07

1–2 R213/R213 38 (24.4) 38.6 (31.1, 46.1) Reference -- 0.05
R213/H213 33 (21.2) 33.6 (25.7, 41.4) −5.0 0.38
H213/H213 13 (8.3) 25.1 (15.4, 34.8) −13.4 0.04

3+ R213/R213 9 (5.8) 31.3 (13.0, 49.6) Reference -- 0.30
R213/H213 7 (4.5) 23.4 (6.7, 40.1) −7.9 0.52
H213/H213 6 (3.8) 19.1 (3.6, 34.7) −12.2 0.31
*

number does not add up to 175 because 19 participants were missing data on number of live births;

§

adjusted for ethnicity using least squares regression;

p-value (interaction) = 0.83