Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 4.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Health Econ. 2009 Mar 4;10(4):409–419. doi: 10.1007/s10198-009-0144-7

Table 6.

Independent predictors of the observed surveillance costa. Multivariate analysis.

Coeff SD b p-value c
Quarter −0.13 0.01 <0.0001
Recurrence versus absence of recurrence
 Recurrence detected during medical visit for symptoms 0.85 0.29 0.005
 Recurrence detected during routine medical visit 1.42 0.30 <0.0001
Gender
 Men versus women 0.004 0.07 0.96
Age at diagnosis
 65–74 years versus <65 years −0.15 0.09 0.09
 ≥ 75 years versus <65 years −0.25 0.09 0.007
Urban area
 Rural versus urban 0.07 0.08 0.40
Administrative area
 Côte d’Or versus Saône et Loire −0.09 0.07 0.20
Tumour location
 Colon versus rectum −0.07 0.09 0.45
TNM stage at diagnosis
 II versus I 0.18 0.10 0.06
 III +IV versus I 0.22 0.12 0.07
Preoperative complications
 Yes versus no complications −0.23 0.12 0.06
Comorbidities
 Yes versus no comorbidities 0.05 0.08 0.48
Adjuvant chemotherapy
 Yes versus no chemotherapy 0.93 0.10 <0.0001
Adjuvant radiotherapy
 Yes versus no radiotherapy 0.26 0.12 0.03
Distance to the General Practitioner
 > 0 kilometers versus 0 kilometers 0.02 0.07 0.83
Distance to the gastroenterologist
 ≥ 15 kilometers versus <15 kilometers −0.03 0.08 0.83
Intercept 3.39
a

Reimbursement prices were used as a proxy of costs

b

SD = standard deviation;

c

a p-value lower than 5% showed significant results.