Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 17;31(4):293–299. doi: 10.1159/000216540

Table 1.

Social separation stress-induced differences in cortical thickness determined by unbiased mesh modeling analysis

Cluster Area mm2 Mean (SEM) cortical thickness mm
p
intermittent separations no separations
L1 132.74 2.80 (0.02) 2.64 (0.03) 0.001
L2 358.79 2.23 (0.03) 2.07 (0.03) 0.001
L3 29.07 1.82 (0.04) 1.97 (0.05) 0.039
L4 83.72 1.55 (0.04) 1.34 (0.04) 0.003
L5 50.84 1.19 (0.04) 0.96 (0.07) 0.010
L6 65.32 2.23 (0.045) 2.03 (0.05) 0.008
L7 370.92 1.84 (0.03) 1.68 (0.03) 0.000
R1 61.29 2.73 (0.04) 2.55 (0.05) 0.009
R2 97.42 1.90 (0.03) 2.08 (0.04) 0.003
R3 154.71 2.17 (0.03) 2.06 (0.03) 0.015
R4 286.32 1.79 (0.04) 1.65 (0.03) 0.004
R5 8.08 1.61 (0.03) 1.47 (0.05) 0.029

The area and thickness of all clusters identified as significantly different in monkeys exposed to intermittent separation stress compared to the no-stress condition are presented for each cluster location depicted in figure 2 (n = 9 per condition). Total cortical area of the group-average brain template is 25,200 mm2. Clusterwise cortical thickness group differences were confirmed by MANOVA for the left (clusters L1–L7, Wilks' lambda = 0.125, F(7,10) = 9.973, p = 0.001) and right (clusters R1–R5, Wilks' lambda = 0.335, F(5,12) = 4.757, p = 0.013) hemispheres.