Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 26;285(8):5117–5121. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C109.082727

TABLE 1.

Effects of PMA and GFX on proton channel parameters (mean ± S.E. (n))

Relative values of proton channel parameters in each cell before (c = control) or after PMA stimulation and after GFX reversal are shown. All ratios are presented so that a larger number means a larger effect. The gH-V relationship shift by PMA is relative to control, and GFX is relative to PMA (see “Experimental Procedures”). The T29A, T29D, and double mutant T29A/S97A did not respond. Significance by one-sample t test, *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01, compared with no effect (1.0 for ratios, 0 for gH-V shift). None of the differences between WT and S97D or S97A are significant (Student's t test). For comparison, average parameter values from human neutrophils from CGD patients and normal subjects from a previous study (36) are given in columns 4 and 5, respectively.

WT S97A or S97D CGD neutrophils Neutrophils
IH PMA/c 2.39* ± 0.51 (10) 1.42** ± 0.13 (12) 2.55 3.3
IH PMA/GFX 2.19** ± 0.37 (12) 1.22 ± 0.11 (8)
τact c/PMA 2.12 ± 0.53 (10) 1.62** ± 0.15 (12) 1.94 3.7
τact GFX/PMA 1.87** ± 0.22 (12) 1.51* ± 0.21 (8)
τtail PMA/c 1.22 ± 0.11 (10) 1.13 ± 0.067 (12) 1.15 5.5
τtail PMA/GFX 1.54** ± 0.17 (13) 1.14 ± 0.06 (8)
gH-V shift PMA (mV) −10.7** ± 1.9 (7) −7.8** ± 1.6 (8) −13.3 −38.8
gH-V shift GFX (mV) 9.4** ± 1.6 (8) 6.7** ± 1.2 (7)