Table 2.
Highlights of efforts to address biological response in neural probe engineering.
Goal | Approach | Reference |
---|---|---|
Enhance neuronal adhesion while inhibiting astrocyte and meningeal cell adhesion | Immobilized neural cell adhesion molecule L1-NCAM on SiO2 surfaces | Webb et al. (2001) |
Mitigate astrocyte and microglial reaction | Immobilized anti-inflammatory tridecapeptide (α-MSH) on single shank planar electrodes | He et al. (2007) |
Achieve solvent-induced change in elastic modulus | Water-based stimuli responsive cellulose nanofibers embedded in a matrix formed from ethylene oxide epichlorohydrin or poly (vinylacetate) | Capadona et al. (2008) |
Fabricate multi-functional neural electrodes with low impedance, reduced mechanical mismatch between electrode-tissue interface and drug releasing properties | Silicon probe coated with biodegradable nanofibers of PLGA loaded with dexamethasone followed by a coat of alginate gel to induce slow drug release. PEDOT electrochemically polymerized onto electrode sites around PLGA within the alginate gel to reduce impedance | Abidian and Martin (2009) |
Fabricate neuroprosthetic device with microfluidic channels for biomolecule release to reduce tissue reaction | 3-D probe structures (micron-sized channels) fabricated using surface micromachining and DRIE techniques to facilitate diffusion-mediated delivery of transferrin in vivo | Retterer et al. (2004) |