Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 12;2(4):190–201. doi: 10.1007/s12177-009-9041-7

Table 8.

DAVID analysis for Gene Ontology terms enriched in the top 50 genes (ranked by fold change) that were up- or downregulated by cyclic hyperoxia in each strain

GO term Number of genes Fold enrichment a False Discovery Rate b
F344
 Cellular carbohydrate catabolic process 8 9.6 0.033
 Carbohydrate catabolic process 8 9.1 0.049
SD
 Glycolysis 8 18.6 3.72E-04
 Glucose catabolic process 8 15.9 0.0011
 Response to hypoxia 8 15.6 0.0013
 Hexose catabolic process 8 15.2 0.0015
 Monosaccharide catabolic process 8 15.2 0.0015
 Alcohol catabolic process 8 14.7 0.0019
 Cellular carbohydrate catabolic process 8 11.8 0.0083
 Glucose metabolic process 9 11.4 0.0019
 Carbohydrate catabolic process 8 11.1 0.0122
 Monosaccharide metabolic process 11 11.0 8.62E-05
 Hexose metabolic process 10 10.1 9.22E-04
 Soluble fraction 9 7.3 0.0378
 Alcohol metabolic process 12 7.1 0.0013
 Cellular carbohydrate metabolic process 12 6.9 0.0018
 Carbohydrate metabolic process 13 5.3 0.0072

GO terms are ranked by fold enrichment

aThe ratio between the frequency of term-annotated genes in the query gene list compared to the reference gene list, in this case the rat genome

bThe expected percentage of false positives in a given proportion of genes considered to be significant