Table 2.
Raw means of productivity variables at baseline and follow-up
| BI+UC N=25 |
UC N=19 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 3 mo FU | Baseline | 3 mo FU | |
| Variable a |
M (SD) |
M (SD) |
M (SD) |
M (SD) |
| ABSENTEEISM | ||||
| Hours Missed b | 8.84 (30.76) |
7.88 (23.03) |
24.95 (50.86) |
16.53 (17.10) |
| Ratio of Work Hours Missed | 0.05 (0.19) |
0.05 (0.14) |
0.15 (0.31) |
0.10 (0.11) |
| PRESENTEEISM | ||||
| Work Performance | 71.20 (18.33) |
84.00 (10.11) |
64.74 (22.20) |
73.16 (13.76) |
| Relative Work Performance | 1.03 (0.31) |
1.18 (0.20) |
0.93 (0.39) |
1.00 (0.21) |
| COSTS | ||||
| Costs of lost productivity | −$153.88 ($2,316.76) |
−$888.52 ($1,556.77) |
$1,316.10 ($3,218.04) |
$776.50 ($1,668.17) |
a
Each variable was assessed in the past 4 weeks from the assessment
b
Hours missed ranged from −70 (participant worked 70 hours more than expected in 4 weeks) to 130 (participant worked 130 hours less than expected in 4 weeks)
BI = brief intervention
UC = usual care