. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Oct 30;16(3):368. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.10.028

Table 2.

Adjusted and unadjusted models evaluating the association between place of residence and (A) Overall survival and (B) treatment-related mortality

A. Overall Survival
Main Variable	Unadjusted model	Adjusted for Income^a	Adjusted for Patient, Disease and Tx Char^b			Adjusted for Patient, Disease and Tx Char and Income^a,^b
Urban	1.00	1.00	1.00			1.00
Rural	1.09 (1.01–1.18)	1.00 (0.92–1.09)	1.08 (1.00–1.17)			1.01 (0.93–1.10)
	p=0.02	p=0.99	p=0.05			p=0.75
B. Treatment-related mortality^c
Main Variable	Unadjusted model	Adjusted for Income^a		Adjusted for Patient, Disease and Tx Char^b	Adjusted for Patient, Disease and Tx Char and Income^a,^b
Urban	1.00	1.00		1.00	1.00
Rural	1.08 (0.98–1.18)	0.98 (0.88–1.08)		1.08 (0.98–1.18)	1.00 (0.91–1.11)
	p=0.10	p=0.66		p=0.11	p=0.94

Income entered as quartiles: <$34,700, 34,700–43,600, 46,600–56,300, >$56,300

Adjusted for graft type and cell dose, HLA-match, patient age, disease type, disease stage, number of co-morbidities, CMV donor-recipient match, race/ethnicity, and year of transplant

Model stratified for Karnofsky performance score