. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Oct 30;16(3):368. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.10.028

Table 3.

Adjusted and unadjusted models evaluating the association between place of residence and (A) Disease-free survival and (B) Relapse

A. Disease-free survival^c
Main Variable	Unadjusted model	Adjusted for Income^a	Adjusted for Patient, Disease and Tx Char^b		Adjusted for Patient, Disease and Tx Char and Income^a,^b
Urban	1.00	1.00	1.00		1.00
Rural	1.06 (0.98–1.14)	0.97 (0.89–1.05)	1.05 (0.97–1.14)		0.99 (0.91–1.07)
	p=0.15	p=0.48	p=0.20		p=0.76
B. Relapse
Main Variable	Unadjusted model	Adjusted for Income^a		Adjusted for Patient, Disease and Tx Char^b	Adjusted for Patient, Disease and Tx Char and Income^a,^b
Urban	1.00	1.00		1.00	1.00
Rural	1.04 (0.90–1.18)	0.98 (0.85–1.13)		1.02 (0.89–1.16)	0.97 (0.83–1.12)
	p=0.61	p=0.78		p=0.83	p=0.66

Income entered as quartiles: <$34,700, 34,700–43,600, 46,600–56,300, >$56,300

Adjusted for graft type and cell dose, HLA-match, patient age, disease type, disease stage, number of co-morbidities, CMV donor-recipient match, race/ethnicity, and year of transplant

Model stratified for Karnofsky performance score