Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Marriage Fam. 2008 Dec 1;70(5):1094. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00551.x

Table 1.

Descriptive characteristics of independent and dependent variables

Variables Baseline Baseline→Y1 Baseline→Y3
Fathers’ engagement, M, SD 27.78 (13.19) 44.38 (22.03)
M/F perception of prenatal involve., M, SD 0.00 (1.00)
Father has children from other unions, n,% 642 (38.1)
Father has new child, not with target child’s mother, n, % 105 (6.2)
Mother employed, n, % 921 (54.6) 986 (58.5)
Child is a boy, n, % 642 (38.1)
M perception of child’s poor health, M, SD 1.50 (.81) 1.52 (.76)
F perception of child’s poor health, M, SD 1.47 (.78) 1.49 (.75)
M perception of child temperament, M, SD 5.63 (3.18)
Paternity established, n, % 1339 (79.4)
Status salience, M, SD 11.12 (1.37)
Relationship quality transitions, n, %
 Improved 144 (8.5) 134 (7.9)
 Declined 547 (32.4) 593 (35.2)
 High at both times 676 (40.1) 630 (37.4)
 Low at both times (reference) 319 (19.0) 329 (19.5)
Relationship status transitions, n, %
 R→R 865 (51.3) 739 (43.8)
 N→R 233 (13.8) 211 (12.5)
 R→N 206 (12.2) 331 (19.6)
 N→N (reference) 382 (22.7) 405 (24.1)
Risky behavior transitions, n, %
 Unemployed→employed 168 (10) 209 (12.4)
 Employed→employed 1076 (63.8) 1077 (63.9)
 Unemployed at y1 (or y3) (reference) 442 (26.2) 400 (23.7)

Note. N = 1,686. All categorical variables are coded 0 = no, 1 = yes. R = residential, N = non-residential.