Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 28.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2009 Feb 28;28(5):814. doi: 10.1002/sim.3518

Table I.

Simulation results (Set I) comparing correlation modeling (M) with conventional assumption of exchangeable correlation of constant magnitude (C). ECP is empirical coverage probability for 95% confidence intervals for β1. Details of the simulation settings are provided in the text.

Correlation level Very high High Moderate Low
True β1 0.81 0.90 1.35 0.81 0.90 1.35 0.81 0.90 1.35 0.81 0.90 1.35

Bias (M) 0.01 0.04 0.11 0.05 0.04 0.10 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.05
Bias (C) 0.00 0.03 0.10 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.02
Rel. Bias (M) 0.01 0.04 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.03
Rel. Bias (C) 0.00 0.03 0.07 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02
Rel. Eff. 0.78 0.84 0.91 0.89 0.87 0.91 0.88 1.00 1.01 1.01 0.99 1.03
Rel. MSE 0.81 0.89 0.95 0.98 0.94 0.99 0.94 1.08 1.06 1.06 1.05 1.10
Emp. power (M) 0.71 0.78 0.93 0.93 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Emp. power (C) 0.60 0.69 0.86 0.89 0.90 0.98 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ECP (M) 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.95 0.94 0.94
ECP (C) 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.95 0.96 0.95 0.96 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.95