Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 17;5(2):e9271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009271

Table 1. Durations used in each study providing a direct comparison of retrospective vs. prospective paradigms.

Articles Task duration
120 s or less
Avni-Babad & Ritov [25] 120 s
Boltz [5] 7 s to 10 s
Bueno Martínez [54] 80 s
Brown [30] 16 s or 32 s
Gruber & Block [26] 15 s
Hicks, Miller & Kinsbourne [11] 42 s
Klapproth [27] 15 s to 45 s
Kurtz & Strube [28] 30 s or 60 s
McClain [14] 120 s
Miller, Hicks & Wilette [12] 32 s to 54 s
Predebon [31] 10 s to 50 s
Predebon [55] 48 s
Predebon [29] 12,5 s to 50 s
Zakay [37] 3 s or 6 s
Zakay [15] 12 s or 15 s
Zakay & Fallach [34] 10 s
121 s to 20 min
Block [35] 165 s (exp1)
160 s (exp2)
Block, George & Reed [56] 270 s
Brown & Stubbs [44] 14,45 min to 19,18 min (exp1)
7,7 min to 19,6 min (exp2)
Brown & Stubbs [6] 466 s or 836 s
Kikkawa [33] 20 min
20 min or more
Bakan [32] 60 min
Tobin & Grondin [8] 8 min and 24 min**

**Each participant made three consecutive tasks of 8 min, 8 min and 24 min and estimated time (prospectively or retrospectively) only at the end of all three tasks.